Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25426384›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2014

Detergent-free Decellularized Nerve Grafts for Long-gap Peripheral Nerve Reconstruction.

Srikanth Vasudevan, Jiying Huang, Barry Botterman, Hani S Matloub, Edward Keefer, Jonathan Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Srikanth VasudevanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.; Department of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Tex.; Department of Cell Biology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.; and Nerves Incorporated, Dallas, Tex.
Jiying HuangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.; Department of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Tex.; Department of Cell Biology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.; and Nerves Incorporated, Dallas, Tex.
Barry BottermanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.; Department of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Tex.; Department of Cell Biology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.; and Nerves Incorporated, Dallas, Tex.
Hani S MatloubDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.; Department of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Tex.; Department of Cell Biology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.; and Nerves Incorporated, Dallas, Tex.
Edward KeeferDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.; Department of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Tex.; Department of Cell Biology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.; and Nerves Incorporated, Dallas, Tex.
Jonathan ChengDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.; Department of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Tex.; Department of Cell Biology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.; and Nerves Incorporated, Dallas, Tex.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

UT Southwestern Center for Translational Medicine (UL1/KL2/TL1)UL1TR001105 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$24.5M
UT-Southwestern Clinical and Translational Alliance for Research (UT-STAR) (TL1)UL1TR000451 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2012 to 2012
$6.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000451NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-gap peripheral nerve defects arising from tumor, trauma, or birth-related injuries requiring nerve reconstruction are currently treated using nerve autografts and nerve allografts. Autografts are associated with limited supply and donor-site morbidity. Allografts require administration of transient immunosuppressants, which has substantial associated risks. To overcome these limitations, we investigated the use of detergent-free decellularized nerve grafts to reconstruct long-gap nerve defects in a rodent model and compared it with existing detergent processing techniques.

methodsNerve grafts were harvested from the sciatic nerves of 9 donor rats. Twenty-four recipient rats were divided into 4 groups (6 animals per group): (1) nerve grafts (NG, positive control), (2) detergent-free decellularized (DFD) grafts, (3) detergent decellularized grafts, and (4) silicone tube conduits (negative control). Each recipient rat had a 3.5-cm graft or conduit sutured across a sciatic nerve transection injury. All animals were harvested at 12 weeks postimplantation for functional muscle analysis and nerve histomorphometry.

resultsHistomorphometry results indicated maximum growth in NG when compared with other groups. DFD and detergent decellularized groups showed comparable regeneration at 12 weeks. Silicone tube group showed no regeneration as expected. Muscle force data indicated functional recovery in NG and DFD groups only.

conclusionsThis study describes a detergent-free nerve decellularization technique for reconstruction of long-gap nerve injuries. We compared DFD grafts with an established detergent processing technique and found that DFD nerve grafts are successful in promoting regeneration across long-gap peripheral nerve defects as an alternative to existing strategies.

Identifiers

PMID25426384
PMCPMC4236362
OpenAlexW2086470163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.