ReviewFrontiers in genetics2014
The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heritability Estimates of Behavioral Traits and Their Genetic Relationships with Performance Traits in Japanese Quail.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Article
- Towards assessing indirect genetic effects in dairy cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- Transcriptomic and Proteomic Analyses of the Liver and Ileum Identify Key Genes and Pathways Associated with Low and High Groups of Social Genetic Effect of Residual Feed Intake.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Genomic Evaluation of Harvest Weight Uniformity inBiology · 2025Article
- Feeding Behaviour in Group-Housed Growing-Finishing Pigs and Its Relationship with Growth and Feed Efficiency.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Indirect genetic effects increase the heritable variation available to selection and are largest for behaviors: a meta-analysis.Evolution letters · 2025Article
- Towards genetic improvement of social behaviours in livestock using large-scale sensor data: data simulation and genetic analysis.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Selection for social genetic effects in purebred pigs improves behaviour and handling of their crossbred progeny.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Partners in Health: Investigating Social Genetic Effects Among Married and Cohabiting Couples.Behavior genetics · 2023Article
- Direct and indirect phenotypic effects on sociability indicate potential to evolve.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2023Article
- Capturing indirect genetic effects on phenotypic variability: Competition meets canalization.Evolutionary applications · 2022Article
- Genetic Analysis of Novel Behaviour Traits in Pigs Derived from Social Network Analysis.Genes · 2022Article
- Indirect Genetic Effects: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective on Empirical Studies.The Journal of heredity · 2022Article
- Exploiting animal personality to reduce chronic stress in captive fish populations.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Welfare issues and potential solutions for laying hens in free range and organic production systems: A review based on literature and interviews.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Review
- Relationship between indirect genetic effects for growth, environmental enrichment, coping style and sex with the serum metabolome profile of pigs.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Social competition as a driver of phenotype-environment correlations: implications for ecology and evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2021Article
- A combined GWAS approach reveals key loci for socially-affected traits in Yorkshire pigs.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Statistical model and testing designs to increase response to selection with constrained inbreeding in genomic breeding programs for pigs affected by social genetic effects.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social interactions between individuals living in a group can have both positive and negative effects on welfare, productivity, and health of these individuals. Negative effects of social interactions in livestock are easier to observe than positive effects. For example, laying hens may develop feather pecking, which can cause mortality due to cannibalism, and pigs may develop tail biting or excessive aggression. Several studies have shown that social interactions affect the genetic variation in a trait. Genetic improvement of socially-affected traits, however, has proven to be difficult until relatively recently. The use of classical selection methods, like individual selection, may result in selection responses opposite to expected, because these methods neglect the effect of an individual on its group mates (social genetic effects). It has become clear that improvement of socially-affected traits requires selection methods that take into account not only the direct effect of an individual on its own phenotype but also the social genetic effects, also known as indirect genetic effects, of an individual on the phenotypes of its group mates. Here, we review the theoretical and empirical work on social genetic effects, with a focus on livestock. First, we present the theory of social genetic effects. Subsequently, we evaluate the evidence for social genetic effects in livestock and other species, by reviewing estimates of genetic parameters for direct and social genetic effects. Then we describe the results of different selection experiments. Finally, we discuss issues concerning the implementation of social genetic effects in livestock breeding programs. This review demonstrates that selection for socially-affected traits, using methods that target both the direct and social genetic effects, is a promising, but sometimes difficult to use in practice, tool to simultaneously improve production and welfare in livestock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.