Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25426047›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2014

The brain's response to pleasant touch: an EEG investigation of tactile caressing.

Harsimrat Singh, Markus Bauer, Wojtek Chowanski, Yi Sui, Douglas Atkinson, Sharon Baurley, Martin Fry, Joe Evans, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The reality of virtual reality.Frontiers in psychology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Harsimrat SinghUCL Interaction Centre, University College London London, UK ; School of Engineering and Design, Brunel University London, UK ; Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London London, UK.
Markus BauerSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham Nottingham, UK.
Wojtek ChowanskiUCL Interaction Centre, University College London London, UK.
Yi SuiUCL Interaction Centre, University College London London, UK.
Douglas AtkinsonLondon College of Fashion, University of the Arts London London, UK.
Sharon BaurleySchool of Engineering and Design, Brunel University London, UK.
Martin FryDepartment of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London London, UK.
Joe EvansDepartment of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London London, UK.
Nadia Bianchi-BerthouzeUCL Interaction Centre, University College London London, UK.
London Centre for Nanotechnology · GBUniversity College London · GBBrunel University of London · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of the Arts London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatosensation as a proximal sense can have a strong impact on our attitude toward physical objects and other human beings. However, relatively little is known about how hedonic valence of touch is processed at the cortical level. Here we investigated the electrophysiological correlates of affective tactile sensation during caressing of the right forearm with pleasant and unpleasant textile fabrics. We show dissociation between more physically driven differential brain responses to the different fabrics in early somatosensory cortex - the well-known mu-suppression (10-20 Hz) - and a beta-band response (25-30 Hz) in presumably higher-order somatosensory areas in the right hemisphere that correlated well with the subjective valence of tactile caressing. Importantly, when using single trial classification techniques, beta-power significantly distinguished between pleasant and unpleasant stimulation on a single trial basis with high accuracy. Our results therefore suggest a dissociation of the sensory and affective aspects of touch in the somatosensory system and may provide features that may be used for single trial decoding of affective mental states from simple electroencephalographic measurements.

Indexed as

affective touchbeta bandelectroencephalogram (EEG)somatosensationsomatosensorytactile

Identifiers

PMID25426047
PMCPMC4226147
OpenAlexW2121734213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.