Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25425966›Full record

ArticleNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)2014

RNA-Seq accurately identifies cancer biomarker signatures to distinguish tissue of origin.

Iris H Wei, Yang Shi, Hui Jiang, Chandan Kumar-Sinha, Arul M Chinnaiyan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Molecular Pathology of Lung Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Rapid preliminary purity evaluation of tumor biopsies using deep learning approach.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iris H WeiUniversity of Michigan Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109.
Yang ShiUniversity of Michigan Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109.
Hui JiangUniversity of Michigan Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109.
Chandan Kumar-SinhaMichigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109 ; University of Michigan Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109.
Arul M ChinnaiyanMichigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109 ; University of Michigan Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109 ; Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109 ; University of Michigan Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109 ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109.

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Alexey I Nesvizhskii · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic cancer of unknown primary (CUP) accounts for up to 5% of all new cancer cases, with a 5-year survival rate of only 10%. Accurate identification of tissue of origin would allow for directed, personalized therapies to improve clinical outcomes. Our objective was to use transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) to identify lineage-specific biomarker signatures for the cancer types that most commonly metastasize as CUP (colorectum, kidney, liver, lung, ovary, pancreas, prostate, and stomach). RNA-Seq data of 17,471 transcripts from a total of 3,244 cancer samples across 26 different tissue types were compiled from in-house sequencing data and publically available International Cancer Genome Consortium and The Cancer Genome Atlas datasets. Robust cancer biomarker signatures were extracted using a 10-fold cross-validation method of log transformation, quantile normalization, transcript ranking by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and stepwise logistic regression. The entire algorithm was then repeated with a new set of randomly generated training and test sets, yielding highly concordant biomarker signatures. External validation of the cancer-specific signatures yielded high sensitivity (92.0% ± 3.15%; mean ± standard deviation) and specificity (97.7% ± 2.99%) for each cancer biomarker signature. The overall performance of this RNA-Seq biomarker-generating algorithm yielded an accuracy of 90.5%. In conclusion, we demonstrate a computational model for producing highly sensitive and specific cancer biomarker signatures from RNA-Seq data, generating signatures for the top eight cancer types responsible for CUP to accurately identify tumor origin.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansLogistic ModelsMaleModels, GeneticNeoplasms, Unknown PrimaryReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, RNABiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID25425966
PMCPMC4240918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.