Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25425433›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2014

Antibiotic susceptibility of Clostridium difficile is similar worldwide over two decades despite widespread use of broad-spectrum antibiotics: an analysis done at the University Hospital of Zurich.

Andrea C Büchler, Silvana K Rampini, Simon Stelling, Bruno Ledergerber, Silke Peter, Alexander Schweiger, Christian Ruef, Reinhard Zbinden, Roberto F Speck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Epidemiology ofSaudi medical journal · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antibiotic Resistances of Clostridioides difficile.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Identification of novel, crypticMicrobial genomics · 2022
    Article
  9. Fidaxomicin Use in the Pediatric Population withClinical pharmacology : advances and applications · 2022
    Review
  10. Association between duration of antipseudomonal beta-lactam therapy andAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2022
    Article
  11. Temporal Variations in Patterns ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Effect of a Piperacillin/Tazobactam Shortage on Antimicrobial Prescribing and Clostridium difficile Risk in 88 US Medical Centers.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017
    Article
  16. Role of cephalosporins in the era of Clostridium difficile infection.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2017
    Review
  17. Management of a cluster ofAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2017
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Annals of Saudi medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea C BüchlerDivision of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. andrea.buechler@gmx.ch.
Silvana K RampiniDivision of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. Silvana.rampini@usz.ch.
Simon StellingDivision of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. simon.stelling@ergon.ch.
Bruno LedergerberDivision of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. infled@usz.uzh.ch.
Silke PeterInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, Gloriastrasse 30/32, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland. silke.peter@med.uni-tuebingen.d.
Alexander SchweigerDivision of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. Alexander.Schweiger@spital-schwyz.ch.
Christian RuefDivision of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. Christian.ruef@hirslanden.ch.
Reinhard ZbindenInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, Gloriastrasse 30/32, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland. rzbinden@imm.uzh.ch.
Roberto F SpeckDivision of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. Roberto.speck@usz.ch.
University of Zurich · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClostridium difficile infection (CDI) remains a major health problem worldwide. Antibiotic use, in general, and clindamycin and ciprofloxacin, in particular, have been implicated in the pathogenesis of CDI. Here, we hypothesized that antibiotics that are highly active in vitro against C. difficile are less frequently associated with CDI than others. The primary goals of our study were to determine if antibiotic susceptibility and CDI are associated and whether the antimicrobial susceptibility of C. difficile changed over the years. METHODS AND

resultsWe examined a large panel of C. difficile strains collected in 2006-2008 at the University Hospital of Zurich. We found that the antimicrobial susceptibilities to amoxicillin/clavulanate, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, metronidazole and vancomycin were similar to those reported in the literature and that they are similar to those reported in other populations over the last two decades. Antibiotic activity did not prevent CDI. For example, thre use of meropenem, which is highly active against all strains tested, was a clear risk factor for CDI. Most of the antibiotics tested also showed a higher minimum inhibitory concentration distribution than that of EUCAST. All strains were susceptible to metronidazole. One strain was resistant to vancomycin.

conclusionsAntibiotic susceptibilities of the collection of C. difficile from the University Hospital of Zurich are similar to those reported by others since the 1980. Patients treated with carbapenems and cephalosporins had the highest risk of developing CDI irrespective of the antimicrobial activity of carbapenems.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinClindamycinClostridioides difficileCross InfectionDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousHospitals, UniversityHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSwitzerlandAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinClindamycin

Identifiers

PMID25425433
PMCPMC4247760
OpenAlexW2153772628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.