ArticleBMC medical ethics2014
Public's attitudes on participation in a biobank for research: an Italian survey.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- The willingness to participate in biomedical research involving human beings in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2019Pooled it
- The research participant perspective related to the conduct of genomic cohort studies: A systematic review of the quantitative literature.Translational behavioral medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Biobank consent preferences and implications for a mixed consent model: biomedical researchers vs. community stakeholders in a semi-urban Yoruba community, Nigeria.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Biobank participants' perspectives on receiving genetic risk information from a biobank - the case of haemochromatosis.BMC medical genomics · 2025Article
- Returning of individual genetic findings to biobank participants: a mixed methods study results in Lithuania.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- The Public Knowledge of Precision Medicine and Genomic Research: A Survey in the Aosta Valley.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Public awareness, attitudes, and motivation toward biobanks: a survey of China.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- When Biobanks Meet Religion: Association Between Religiosity and Attitudes of Polish Medical Students Toward Biobanking of Human Biological Material for Research Purposes.Journal of religion and health · 2024Article
- Genetic tests as the strongest motivator of cooperation between participants and biobanks-Findings from cross-sectional study.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Predicting Participation Willingness in Ecological Momentary Assessment of General Population Health and Behavior: Machine Learning Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Assessment of willingness of Saudi public to participate in a dental biorepository for research purposes.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Building a rheumatology biobank for reliable basic/translational research and precision medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Public Attitude towards Biobanking: An Italian University Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Assessment of Biobanking Knowledge and Attitudes towards Biospecimen Donation among Healthcare Providers in Saudi Arabia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Identification and Assessment of Risks in Biobanking: The Case of the Cancer Institute of Bari.Cancers · 2022Article
- Associations between the Willingness to Donate Samples to Biobanks and Selected Psychological Variables.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- A blank check or a global public good? A qualitative study of how ethics review committee members in Colombia weigh the risks and benefits of broad consent for data and sample sharing during a pandemic.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Public Attitudes to Digital Health Research Repositories: Cross-sectional International Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Trust and Trade-Offs in Sharing Data for Precision Medicine: A National Survey of Singapore.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe creation of biobanks depends upon people's willingness to donate their samples for research purposes and to agree to sample storage. Moreover, biobanks are a public good that requires active participation by all interested stakeholders at every stage of development. Therefore, knowing public's attitudes towards participation in a biobank and biobank management is important and deserves investigation.
methodA survey was conducted among family members of patients attending the outpatient department of our institute for a geriatric or neurological visit, documenting their willingness to participate in a biobank and their views on the legal-ethical aspects of biobank management. Information regarding subjects' attitudes on biomedical research in general and genetic research in particular was also collected. Participants' data on biobanks were compared with data previously collected from the Italian ethics committees (ECs) to evaluate the extent to which lay people and ethics committees share views and concerns regarding biobanks.
resultsOne hundred forty-five subjects took part in the survey. The willingness to give biological samples for the constitution of a biobank set up for research purposes was declared by 86% of subjects and was modulated by subjects' education. People in favour of providing biological samples for a biobank expressed a more positive view on biomedical research than did people who were not in favour; attitude towards genetic research in dementia was the strongest predictor of participation. Different from ECs that prefer specific consent (52%) and do not choose the option of broad consent (8%) for samples collection in a biobank, participants show a clear preference for broad consent (57%), followed by partially restricted consent (16%), specific consent (15%), and multi-layered consent (12%). Almost all of the subjects available to contribute to a biobank desire to receive both individual research results and research results of general value, while around fifty per cent of ECs require results communication.
conclusionFamily members showed willingness to participate in a biobank for research and expressed a view on the ethical aspects of a biobank management that differ on several issues from the Italian ECs' opinion. Laypersons' views should be taken into account in developing biobank regulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.