ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2015
The survey on cellular and engineered tissue therapies in Europe in 2012.
Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Landscape of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in Slovenian Transfusion Medicine: A Review of Past and Future Outlook.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026Review
- The Survey on Cellular and Tissue-Engineered Therapies in Europe in 2016 and 2017.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2021Article
- Human articular cartilage repair: Sources and detection of cytotoxicity and genotoxicity in photo-crosslinkable hydrogel bioscaffolds.Stem cells translational medicine · 2020Review
- Successful development and clinical translation of a novel anterior lamellar artificial cornea.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2019Article
- Innovative regenerative medicines in the EU: a better future in evidence?BMC medicine · 2017Article
- Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation activity worldwide in 2012 and a SWOT analysis of the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group including the global survey.Bone marrow transplantation · 2016Article
- Insurance approval of mesenchymal stem cell for acute GVHD in Japan: need of follow up for some remaining concerns.International journal of hematology · 2016Review
- Use of bone marrow-derived cells for regenerative medicine in Cuba.Bone marrow transplantation · 2016Article
- Hematopoietic SCT in Europe 2013: recent trends in the use of alternative donors showing more haploidentical donors but fewer cord blood transplants.Bone marrow transplantation · 2015Article
- Mesenchymal stem cells: potential for therapy and treatment of chronic non-healing skin wounds.Organogenesis · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following the coordinated efforts of five established scientific organizations, this report describes activity in Europe for the year 2012 in the area of cellular and engineered tissue therapies, excluding hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) treatments for the reconstitution of hematopoiesis. Three hundred thirteen teams from 33 countries responded to the cellular and engineered tissue therapy survey: 138 teams from 27 countries provided data on 2157 patients, while a further 175 teams reported no activity. Indications were musculoskeletal/rheumatological disorders (36%; 80% autologous), cardiovascular disorders (25%; 95% autologous), hematology/oncology, predominantly prevention or treatment of graft versus host disease and HSC graft enhancement (19%; 1% autologous), neurological disorders (3%; 99% autologous), gastrointestinal disorders (1%; 71% autologous), and other indications (16%; 79% autologous). Autologous cells were predominantly used for musculoskeletal/rheumatological (42%) and cardiovascular (34%) disorders, whereas allogeneic cells were mainly used for hematology/oncology (60%). The reported cell types were mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (49%), HSC (28%), chondrocytes (11%), dermal fibroblasts (4%), keratinocytes (1%), and others (7%). In 51% of the grafts, cells were delivered after ex vivo expansion, whereas cells were transduced or sorted in 10% and 16%, respectively, of the reported cases. Cells were delivered intra-organ (35%), intravenously (31%), on a membrane or gel (15%), or using 3D scaffolds (19%). The data are compared with those collected since 2008 to identify trends in the field and discussed in the light of recent publications and ongoing clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.