Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25425323›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2015

Evidence accumulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder: the role of uncertainty and monetary reward on perceptual decision-making thresholds.

Paula Banca, Martin D Vestergaard, Vladan Rankov, Kwangyeol Baek, Simon Mitchell, Tatyana Lapa, Miguel Castelo-Branco, Valerie Voon

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05546658 (Effects of Psilocybin in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05546658 early_phase1active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Psilocybin in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2022 to 2027Enrolled35ConditionsObsessive-Compulsive DisorderArmsPsilocybin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Intact responses to non-drug rewards in long-term opioid maintenance treatment.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Modeling the cognitive processes of accepting clinical decision support.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026
    Article
  6. Model-based analysis of stop-signal data reveals robust neural and clinical correlates of evidence accumulation but not inhibition.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Active information sampling in health and disease.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paula Banca1] Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK [2] PhD Programme in Experimental Biology and Biomedicine, Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Portugal [3] Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Portugal.
Martin D VestergaardDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Vladan RankovDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Kwangyeol BaekDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Simon MitchellDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Tatyana LapaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Miguel Castelo-BrancoInstitute for Biomedical Imaging and Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Portugal.
Valerie Voon1] Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK [2] Behavioural and Clinical Neurosciences Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK [3] Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0001354Medical Research Council G1000183Wellcome Trust 093705Wellcome Trust 093705/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The compulsive behaviour underlying obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) may be related to abnormalities in decision-making. The inability to commit to ultimate decisions, for example, patients unable to decide whether their hands are sufficiently clean, may reflect failures in accumulating sufficient evidence before a decision. Here we investigate the process of evidence accumulation in OCD in perceptual discrimination, hypothesizing enhanced evidence accumulation relative to healthy volunteers. Twenty-eight OCD patients and thirty-five controls were tested with a low-level visual perceptual task (random-dot-motion task, RDMT) and two response conflict control tasks. Regression analysis across different motion coherence levels and Hierarchical Drift Diffusion Modelling (HDDM) were used to characterize response strategies between groups in the RDMT. Patients required more evidence under high uncertainty perceptual contexts, as indexed by longer response time and higher decision boundaries. HDDM, which defines a decision when accumulated noisy evidence reaches a decision boundary, further showed slower drift rate towards the decision boundary reflecting poorer quality of evidence entering the decision process in patients under low uncertainty. With monetary incentives emphasizing speed and penalty for slower responses, patients decreased the decision thresholds relative to controls, accumulating less evidence in low uncertainty. These findings were unrelated to visual perceptual deficits and response conflict. This study provides evidence for impaired decision-formation processes in OCD, with a differential influence of high and low uncertainty contexts on evidence accumulation (decision threshold) and on the quality of evidence gathered (drift rates). It further emphasizes that OCD patients are sensitive to monetary incentives heightening speed in the speed-accuracy tradeoff, improving evidence accumulation.

Indexed as

Decision MakingRewardUncertaintyAdultConflict, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMaleObsessive-Compulsive DisorderPsychological TestsReaction TimeRegression AnalysisSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsVisual PerceptionSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID25425323
PMCPMC4349497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.