Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25425322›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2015

Individual variation in the motivational and neurobiological effects of an opioid cue.

Lindsay M Yager, Kyle K Pitchers, Shelly B Flagel, Terry E Robinson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Inhibition of Dopamine Neurons Prevents Incentive Value Encoding of a Reward Cue: With Revelations from Deep Phenotyping.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lindsay M YagerDepartment of Psychology (Biopsychology Program), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kyle K PitchersDepartment of Psychology (Biopsychology Program), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Shelly B Flagel1] Department of Psychology (Biopsychology Program), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA [2] Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA [3] Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Terry E RobinsonDepartment of Psychology (Biopsychology Program), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Variation in Motivational Properties of Reward Cues: Implications for AddictionP01DA031656 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FLAGEL, SHELLY BETH · 2012 to 2016
$6.3M
NIDA Training Program in Neuroscience-Administrative SupplementT32DA007281 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Shelly Beth Flagel · 1995 to 2026
$5.7M
Variability in Responsivity to Drug CuesF31DA030799 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI YAGER, LINDSAY · 2012 to 2013
$65k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA030799NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA031656NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A discrete cue associated with intravenous injections of cocaine acquires greater control over motivated behavior in some rats ('sign-trackers', STs) than others ('goal-trackers', GTs). It is not known, however, if such variation generalizes to cues associated with other drugs. We asked, therefore, whether a discrete cue (a light) associated with the intravenous administration of an opioid drug (the short-acting mu receptor agonist, remifentanil) acquires incentive motivational properties differently in STs and GTs, as indicated by tests of Pavlovian conditioned approach and conditioned reinforcement. Consistent with studies using cocaine, STs approached a classically conditioned opioid cue more readily than GTs, and in a test of conditioned reinforcement worked more avidly to get it. Interestingly, STs and GTs did not differ in the acquisition of a conditioned orienting response. In addition, the performance of conditioned approach behavior, but not conditioned orientation, was attenuated by pretreatment with the dopamine receptor antagonist, flupenthixol, into the core of the nucleus accumbens. Lastly, food and opioid cues engaged similar amygdalo-striatal-thalamic circuitry to a much greater extent in STs than GTs, as indicated by Fos expression. Taken together, these data demonstrate that, similar to food and cocaine cues: (1) a discrete opioid cue attains greater incentive motivational value in STs than GTs; (2) the attribution of incentive motivational properties to an opioid cue is dopamine dependent; and (3) an opioid cue engages the so-called 'motive circuit' only if it is imbued with incentive salience.

Indexed as

CuesIndividualityAdministration, IntravenousAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsBrainConditioning, ClassicalDopamine AntagonistsFlupenthixolFoodHistory, MedievalMaleMotivationNeural PathwaysOrientationPhotic StimulationAnalgesics, OpioidDopamine AntagonistsFlupenthixolPiperidinesReceptors, DopamineReceptors, Opioid, muRemifentanil

Identifiers

PMID25425322
PMCPMC4367472
OpenAlexW2028981513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.