Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25424954›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2014

Development of improved pertussis vaccine.

Martin Rumbo, Daniela Hozbor

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pathogens and global health · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Bordetella pertussis: new concepts in pathogenesis and treatment.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin Rumboa Laboratorio VacSal; Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular (IBBM); Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Universidad Nacional de La Plata; CCT-CONICET La Plata; La Plata, Argentina.
Daniela Hozbor
Universidad Nacional de La Plata · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rates of infection with Bordetella pertussis, the gram-negative bacterium that causes the respiratory disease called whooping cough or pertussis, have not abated and 16 million cases with almost 200,000 deaths are estimated by the WHO to have occurred worldwide in 2008. Despite relatively high vaccination rates, the disease has come back in recent years to afflict people in numbers not seen since the pre-vaccine days. Indeed, pertussis is now recognized as a frequent infection not only in newborn and infants but also in adults. The disease symptoms also can be induced by the non-vaccine-preventable infection with the close species B. parapertussis for which an increasing number of cases have been reported. The epidemiologic situation and current knowledge of the limitations of pertussis vaccine point out the need to design improved vaccines. Several alternative approaches and their challenges are summarized.

Indexed as

Bordetella parapertussisBordetella pertussisDrug DiscoveryHumansPertussis VaccineWhooping CoughPertussis VaccineBordetella parapertussisBordetella pertussispertussisvaccineswhooping cough

Identifiers

PMID25424954
PMCPMC4896757
OpenAlexW1991809367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.