Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25424950›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2014

The relationship between meteorological factors and mumps incidence in Guangzhou, China, 2005-2012:.

Qiongying Yang, Zhicong Yang, Haiyuan Ding, Xiao Zhang, Zhiqiang Dong, Wensui Hu, Xiangyi Liu, Ming Wang, Guifang Hu, Chuanxi Fu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Atypical Mumps; are We Heading Towards an Outbreak?Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Association between Meteorological Factors and Mumps and Models for Prediction in Chongqing, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Current Status of Mumps Virus Infection: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Vaccine.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  18. Effects of extreme meteorological factors on daily mumps cases in Hefei, China, during 2011-2016.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Epidemiological Characteristics and Spatiotemporal Analysis of Mumps from 2004 to 2018 in Chongqing, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Qiongying Yanga School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou, PR China.
Zhicong Yang
Haiyuan Ding
Xiao Zhang
Zhiqiang Dong
Wensui Hu
Xiangyi Liu
Ming Wang
Guifang Hu
Chuanxi Fu
Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNSouthern Medical University · CNINTRASOFT International (Luxembourg) · LU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the past decade, there have been resurgences and large-scale outbreaks of mumps worldwide. Little evidence is available on the relationship between meteorological factors and the incidence of mumps. We aimed to explore the effects of meteorological factors on mumps incidence.

methodsA Poisson regression model combined with a distributed lag non-linear model (DLNM) was used to evaluate the association between meteorological factors and the mumps incidence in Guangzhou, China, 2005-2012.

resultsNonlinear relationships between meteorological factors, except sunshine hours, and mumps incidence were observed. The relative risks (RRs) of mean temperature, relative humidity and atmospheric pressure were 1.81 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.41 to 2.32), 1.28 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.59), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95) comparing the 99th percentile to the median of their own, respectively. For wind velocity, the RR was 0.70 (95%CI, 0.54 to 0.91) comparing the 1st percentile to the median. The hot effect and cold effect were larger in females than in males, and the hot effect increased with age.

conclusionsMean temperature, relative humidity, wind velocity and atmospheric pressure might be important predictors of the mumps incidence. Tropical cyclone caused a higher increase in mumps cases. Our findings highlight the need to strengthen the awareness of using protective measures during typhoon days and allocating more attention to the susceptible populations during the summer. The two-dose regimen of mumps vaccine should be included in the National Immunization Program schedule, and the catch-up vaccination campaigns should be promoted among adults.

Indexed as

Meteorological ConceptsAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolChinaFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalMumpsYoung AdultChinadistributed lag non-linear modelmeteorological factormumpsrelationship

Identifiers

PMID25424950
PMCPMC4896791
OpenAlexW1963153793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.