ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2014
Knowledge of and attitudes to influenza in unvaccinated primary care physicians and nurses.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Training needs assessment of European frontline health care workers on vaccinology and vaccine acceptance: a systematic review.European journal of public health · 2023Pooled it
- Influenza vaccination rates among healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating influencing factors.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- Barriers of Influenza Vaccination Intention and Behavior - A Systematic Review of Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy, 2005 - 2016.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Influenza and COVID-19 vaccination intention in Portuguese adults from at-risk groups: a mixed-method study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Mapping trends and hotspots in research on global influenza vaccine hesitancy: A bibliometric analysis.Health science reports · 2024Article
- The effectiveness of interventions to improve the seasonal influenza vaccination uptake among nurses: A systematic review.Journal of infection prevention · 2023Review
- Factors associated with recommendation behaviors of four non-National Immunization Program vaccines: a cross-sectional survey among public health workers in China.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2023Article
- Vaccination status, acceptance, and knowledge toward a COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional survey in China.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Article
- Demand and motivation for influenza vaccination among healthcare workers before and during the COVID-19 era: a cross-sectional survey.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Article
- The influenza vaccine for nursing and care professionals at emergency services in Flanders.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Article
- Willingness of the general population to accept and pay for COVID-19 vaccination during the early stages of COVID-19 pandemic: a nationally representative survey in mainland China.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Article
- Seasonal Influenza Vaccination and Recommendation: The Difference between General Practitioners and Public Health Workers in China.Vaccines · 2020Article
- [Health professionals' attitudes against influenza vaccination in a spanish terciary hospital].Revista espanola de salud publica · 2019Article
- Maternal Care Providers' Barriers Regarding Influenza and Pertussis Vaccination During Pregnancy in Catalonia, Spain.Maternal and child health journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary healthcare workers, especially nurses, are exposed to the vast majority of patients with influenza and play an important role in vaccinating patients. Healthcare workers' misconceptions about influenza and influenza vaccination have been reported as possible factors associated with lack of vaccination. The objective of this study was to compare the characteristics of unvaccinated physicians and unvaccinated nurses in the 2011-2012 influenza season. We performed an anonymous web survey of Spanish primary healthcare workers in 2012. Information was collected on vaccination and knowledge of and attitudes to the influenza vaccine. Multivariate analysis was performed using unconditional logistic regression. We included 461 unvaccinated physicians and 402 unvaccinated nurses. Compared with unvaccinated nurses, unvaccinated physicians had more frequently received seasonal influenza vaccination in the preceding seasons (aOR 1.58; 95% CI 1.11-2.25), and more frequently believed that vaccination of high risk individuals is effective in reducing complications (aOR 2.53; 95% CI 1.30-4.95) and that influenza can be a serious illness (aOR 1.65; 95% CI 1.17-2.32). In contrast, unvaccinated physicians were less concerned about infecting patients (aOR 0.62; 95% CI 0.40-0.96). Unvaccinated nurses had more misconceptions than physicians about influenza and the influenza vaccine and more doubts about the severity of annual influenza epidemics in patients with high risk conditions and the prevention of complications by means of the influenza vaccination. For unvaccinated physicians, strategies to improve vaccination coverage should stress the importance of physicians as a possible source of infection of their patients. The effectiveness of influenza vaccination of high risk persons should be emphasized in nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.