Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25424945›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2014

Knowledge of and attitudes to influenza in unvaccinated primary care physicians and nurses.

Angela Domínguez, Pere Godoy, Jesús Castilla, José María Mayoral, Núria Soldevila, Núria Torner, Diana Toledo, Jenaro Astray, Sonia Tamames, Susana García-Gutiérrez and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Angela Domíngueza Departament de Salut Pública; Universitat de Barcelona; Barcelona, Spain.
Pere Godoy
Jesús Castilla
José María Mayoral
Núria Soldevila
Núria Torner
Diana Toledo
Jenaro Astray
Sonia Tamames
Susana García-Gutiérrez
Fernando González-Candelas
Vicente Martín
José Díaz
CIBERES P Working Group for the Survey on Influenza Vaccination in Primary Health Care Workers
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública · ESAgència de Salut Pública de Catalunya · ESAndalusian Health Service · ESDepartamento de Epidemiología · GTJunta de Castilla y León · ESUnidad de Investigación en cuidados y servicios de salud (Investén-isciii) · ESUniversidad de León · ESUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary healthcare workers, especially nurses, are exposed to the vast majority of patients with influenza and play an important role in vaccinating patients. Healthcare workers' misconceptions about influenza and influenza vaccination have been reported as possible factors associated with lack of vaccination. The objective of this study was to compare the characteristics of unvaccinated physicians and unvaccinated nurses in the 2011-2012 influenza season. We performed an anonymous web survey of Spanish primary healthcare workers in 2012. Information was collected on vaccination and knowledge of and attitudes to the influenza vaccine. Multivariate analysis was performed using unconditional logistic regression. We included 461 unvaccinated physicians and 402 unvaccinated nurses. Compared with unvaccinated nurses, unvaccinated physicians had more frequently received seasonal influenza vaccination in the preceding seasons (aOR 1.58; 95% CI 1.11-2.25), and more frequently believed that vaccination of high risk individuals is effective in reducing complications (aOR 2.53; 95% CI 1.30-4.95) and that influenza can be a serious illness (aOR 1.65; 95% CI 1.17-2.32). In contrast, unvaccinated physicians were less concerned about infecting patients (aOR 0.62; 95% CI 0.40-0.96). Unvaccinated nurses had more misconceptions than physicians about influenza and the influenza vaccine and more doubts about the severity of annual influenza epidemics in patients with high risk conditions and the prevention of complications by means of the influenza vaccination. For unvaccinated physicians, strategies to improve vaccination coverage should stress the importance of physicians as a possible source of infection of their patients. The effectiveness of influenza vaccination of high risk persons should be emphasized in nurses.

Indexed as

NursesPhysicians, Primary CareAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesInternetMaleMiddle AgedProfessional CompetenceSpainInfluenza Vaccinesattitudesinfluenza vaccinationknowledgenursesphysicians

Identifiers

PMID25424945
PMCPMC4896788
OpenAlexW1598573740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.