Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25424924›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2014

Evaluation of the immune response to RTS,S/AS01 and RTS,S/AS02 adjuvanted vaccines: randomized, double-blind study in malaria-naïve adults.

Geert Leroux-Roels, Isabel Leroux-Roels, Frédéric Clement, Opokua Ofori-Anyinam, Marc Lievens, Erik Jongert, Philippe Moris, W Ripley Ballou, Joe Cohen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00443131 (Adjuvant Justification Study of Candidate Malaria Vaccines), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00443131 phase2completednot on this map

Adjuvant Justification Study of Candidate Malaria Vaccines (257049), Administered According to a 0, 1, 2 Months Schedule .

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2007 to 2007Enrolled36ConditionsMalariaArmsGSK Malaria vaccine 257049
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Vaccines · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Geert Leroux-Roelsa Centre for Vaccinology (CEVAC); Ghent University and Ghent University Hospital; Ghent, Belgium.
Isabel Leroux-Roels
Frédéric Clement
Opokua Ofori-Anyinam
Marc Lievens
Erik Jongert
Philippe Moris
W Ripley Ballou
Joe Cohen
GlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USIntravacc (Netherlands) · NLGhent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This phase II, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the immunogenicity of RTS,S vaccines containing Adjuvant System AS01 or AS02 as compared with non-adjuvanted RTS,S in healthy, malaria-naïve adults (NCT00443131). Thirty-six subjects were randomized (1:1:1) to receive RTS,S/AS01, RTS,S/AS02, or RTS,S/saline at months 0, 1, and 2. Antibody responses to Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite (CS) and hepatitis B surface (HBs) antigens were assessed and cell-mediated immune responses evaluated by flow cytometry using intracellular cytokine staining on peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Anti-CS antibody avidity was also characterized. Safety and reactogenicity after each vaccine dose were monitored. One month after the third vaccine dose, RTS,S/AS01 (160.3 EU/mL [95%CI: 114.1-225.4]) and RTS,S/AS02 (77.4 EU/mL (95%CI: 47.3-126.7)) recipients had significantly higher anti-CS antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs) than recipients of RTS,S/saline (12.2 EU/mL (95%CI: 4.8-30.7); P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0011, respectively). The anti-CS antibody GMT was significantly higher with RTS,S/AS01 than with RTS,S/AS02 (P = 0.0135). Anti-CS antibody avidity was in the same range in all groups. CS- and HBs-specific CD4(+) T cell responses were greater for both RTS,S/AS groups than for the RTS,S/saline group. Reactogenicity was in general higher for RTS,S/AS compared with RTS,S/saline. Most grade 3 solicited adverse events (AEs) were of short duration and grade 3 solicited general AEs were infrequent in the 3 groups. No serious adverse events were reported. In conclusion, in comparison with non-adjuvanted RTS,S, both RTS,S/AS vaccines exhibited better CS-specific immune responses. The anti-CS antibody response was significantly higher with RTS,S/AS01 than with RTS,S/AS02. The adjuvanted vaccines had acceptable safety profiles.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntibodies, ProtozoanAntibody AffinityCytokinesDouble-Blind MethodDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleFlow CytometryHealthy VolunteersHumansLeukocytes, MononuclearMalaria VaccinesMalePlasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsAntibodies, Protozoancircumsporozoite protein, ProtozoanCytokinesMalaria VaccinesProtozoan ProteinsRTS,S-AS01 vaccineRTS,S-AS02A vaccineVaccines, SyntheticadjuvantAS01AS02cell-mediated immunityhumoral immunitymalariavaccine

Identifiers

PMID25424924
PMCPMC4896765
OpenAlexW2054347139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.