SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2014
Exercise for cancer cachexia in adults.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exercise for cancer cachexia in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Can Exercise Counteract Cancer Cachexia? A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.Integrative cancer therapiesPooled it
- A randomized phase II feasibility trial of a multimodal intervention for the management of cachexia in lung and pancreatic cancer.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2017Trial
- Exercise therapy: an effective approach to mitigate the risk of cancer metastasis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Current status of research on sarcopenia in post-treatment cancer survivors in Japan:A narrative review.Fukushima journal of medical science · 2024Review
- Advancing cancer cachexia diagnosis with -omics technology and exercise as molecular medicine.Sports medicine and health science · 2024Review
- Low-intensity exercise training improves systolic function of heart during metastatic melanoma-induced cachexia in mice.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Effects of Monoamino-Oxidase-A (MAO-A) Inhibition on Skeletal Muscle Inflammation and Wasting through Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in Triple Transgenic Mice.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Review
- Effect of combined therapies including nutrition and physical exercise in advanced cancer patients: A pooled analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Pathophysiology of cachexia and characteristics of dysphagia in chronic diseases.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2022Review
- Voluntary exercise does not improve muscular properties or functional capacity during C26-induced cancer cachexia in mice.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2021Article
- Article
- Sarcopenia: Clinical implications in ovarian cancer, diagnosis, etiology, and management.Sports medicine and health science · 2020Review
- Exercise shapes redox signaling in cancer.Redox biology · 2020Review
- Repeated eccentric contractions positively regulate muscle oxidative metabolism and protein synthesis during cancer cachexia in mice.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2020Article
- Exercise Training as Therapeutic Approach in Cancer Cachexia: A Review of Potential Anti-inflammatory Effect on Muscle Wasting.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Review
- Muscle alterations in the development and progression of cancer-induced muscle atrophy: a review.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2020Review
- Emerging Treatment Options For Cancer-Associated Cachexia: A Literature Review.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2019Review
- Efficacy of Anamorelin, a Novel Non-Peptide Ghrelin Analogue, in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Cachexia-Review and Expert Opinion.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer cachexia is a multi-factorial syndrome characterised by an ongoing loss of skeletal muscle mass, with or without a loss of fat mass, which leads to progressive functional impairment. Physical exercise may attenuate the effects of cancer cachexia via several mechanisms, including the modulation of muscle metabolism, insulin sensitivity and levels of inflammation.
objectivesThe primary objective was to determine the effects of exercise, compared to usual care or no treatment, on lean body mass, the main biomarker of cachexia, in adults with cancer. Secondary objectives, subject to the availability of data, were to examine the acceptability and safety of exercise in this setting and to compare effects according to the characteristics of the exercise intervention or patient population. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the databases CENTRAL (Issue 6, 2014) , MEDLINE (1946 to June 2014), EMBASE (1974 to June 2014), DARE and HTA (Issue 6, 2014), ISI Web of Science (1900 to June 2014), LILACS (1985 to 28 June 2014), PEDro (inception to 28 June 2014), SciVerse SCOPUS (inception to 28 June 2014), Biosis Previews PreMEDLINE (1969 to June 2014) and Open Grey (inception to 28 June 2014). We also searched for ongoing studies, checked reference lists and contacted experts to seek potentially relevant research. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adults meeting the clinical criteria for cancer cachexia comparing a programme of exercise as a sole or adjunct intervention to no treatment or an active control. We imposed no language restriction. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed titles and abstracts of articles for relevance and extracted data on study design, participants, interventions and outcomes from potentially relevant articles. MAIN
resultsWe screened 3154 individual references, of which we removed 3138 after title screening and read 16 in full. We found no trials that met the inclusion criteria. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to determine the safety and effectiveness of exercise for patients with cancer cachexia. Randomised controlled trials (i.e., preferably parallel-group or cluster-randomised trials) are required to test the effectiveness of exercise in this group. There are ongoing studies on the topic, so we will update this review to incorporate the findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.