Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25424857›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2015

Phase I trial of cyclophosphamide as an immune modulator for optimizing oncolytic reovirus delivery to solid tumors.

Victoria Roulstone, Khurum Khan, Hardev S Pandha, Sarah Rudman, Matt Coffey, George M Gill, Alan A Melcher, Richard Vile, Kevin J Harrington, Johann de Bono and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Clinical Application of Oncolytic Viruses: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Victoria RoulstoneChester Beatty Laboratories, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Khurum KhanChester Beatty Laboratories, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Hardev S PandhaPostgraduate Medical School, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Sarah RudmanKing's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Matt CoffeyOncolytics Biotech, Inc., Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
George M GillOncolytics Biotech, Inc., Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Alan A MelcherLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Richard VileMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kevin J HarringtonChester Beatty Laboratories, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Johann de BonoRoyal Marsden Hospital, Down's Road, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom.
James SpicerKing's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom. james.spicer@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

Enhancing Therapy of Primary and Recurrent Tumors With Systemic Oncolytic VirusR01CA175386 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VILE, RICHARD G. · 2014 to 2018
$1.3M
Department of HealthNCI NIH HHS R01 CA175386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeReovirus is a wild-type oncolytic virus that is ubiquitous in the environment; most patients are therefore preimmune. Therapeutic administration leads to an increase in neutralizing antireovirus antibody (NARA) titer. We hypothesized that if NARA limited reovirus antitumor activity, the effect might be attenuated by coadministration of cyclophosphamide. EXPERIMENTAL

designIn a phase I study, patients with advanced cancer received cyclophosphamide 3 days before intravenous reovirus serotype 3 Dearing (RT3D). The primary objective was to reduce the resulting rise in NARA titer. Cyclophosphamide dose was escalated from 25-1,000 mg/m(2) through nine cohorts; we aimed to define a well-tolerated immunomodulatory dose.

resultsThe combination was well tolerated in 36 patients, with grade 3/4 toxicities only seen at or above the maximum tolerated dose of cyclophosphamide, which was 800 mg/m(2) combined with reovirus. Immunosuppressive effect, defined as maintaining NARA titer rise below a predefined threshold, was observed in only one patient. Furthermore, despite expected myelosuppression seen at higher cyclophosphamide doses, no changes in T-cell subsets, including Tregs, occurred with dose escalation. Viable virus was detected in association with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from 14% of patients 10 days after the last RT3D injection, despite high plasma NARA titer, demonstrating a potential mechanism for prolonged evasion of neutralization by reovirus.

conclusionsCoadministration of cyclophosphamide with reovirus is safe, but does not attenuate host antiviral responses. Alternative immunomodulation approaches should be explored, but association with PBMCs may allow reovirus to persist and evade even high levels of neutralizing antibodies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCombined Modality TherapyCyclophosphamideFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOncolytic VirotherapyOncolytic VirusesReoviridaeAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCyclophosphamideImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID25424857
PMCPMC4821068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.