Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25424856›Full record

Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2015

Persistence of CTL clones targeting melanocyte differentiation antigens was insufficient to mediate significant melanoma regression in humans.

Smita S Chandran, Biman C Paria, Abhishek K Srivastava, Luke D Rothermel, Daniel J Stephens, Mark E Dudley, Robert Somerville, John R Wunderlich, Richard M Sherry, James C Yang and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Smita S ChandranSurgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Biman C PariaSurgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Abhishek K SrivastavaSurgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Luke D RothermelSurgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Daniel J StephensSurgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Mark E DudleySurgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Robert SomervilleSurgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
John R WunderlichSurgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Richard M SherrySurgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
James C YangSurgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Steven A RosenbergSurgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Udai S KammulaSurgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland. udai_kammula@nih.gov.
National Cancer Institute · USCenter for Cancer Research · US

Funding

Cell Production Core FacilityZICBC011569 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI HALAS, HYUNMI · 2014 to 2025
$17.4M
High Throughput Isolation of Antigen Specific T-cells for Cancer TherapyZIABC010766 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI KAMMULA, UDAI S · 2009 to 2017
$5.5M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC010766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdoptive transfer of autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) can mediate durable cancer regression in selected patients with metastatic melanoma. However, the tumor antigens associated with these favorable responses remain unclear. We hypothesized that a clinical strategy involving the iterative adoptive transfer of selected autologous antigen-specific T-cell clones could help systematically define immunologic targets associated with successful cancer therapy, without the interpretative ambiguity of transferring polyclonal populations. Here, we evaluated the clinical efficacy of CD8(+) T-cell clones specific for the melanocyte differentiation antigens (MDA), gp100 and MART-1, respectively. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe conducted two consecutive phase II clinical trials involving the adoptive transfer of highly selected autologous antigen-specific CD8(+) T-cell clones against gp100 and MART-1, respectively. Fifteen patients with HLA-A2(+) treatment-refractory metastatic melanoma received highly avid MDA-specific CD8(+) T-cell clones specific for either gp100 (n = 10) or MART-1 (n = 5) with or without intravenous interleukin-2 (IL2) after a lymphodepleting myeloablative preparative regimen.

resultsOf the 15 treated patients, we observed immune-mediated targeting of skin melanocytes in 11 patients (73%) and clonal engraftment in eight patients (53%) after cell transfer. There were only transient minor tumor regressions observed, but no objective tumor responses based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) criteria.

conclusionsDespite successful clonal repopulation and evidence of in vivo antigen targeting, the poor therapeutic efficacy after the adoptive transfer of autologous MDA-specific T cells raises significant concerns regarding future immunotherapy efforts targeting this class of tumor antigens.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveAdultAgedCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCytotoxicity, ImmunologicDermatitisFemalegp100 Melanoma AntigenHLA-A2 AntigenHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMaleMART-1 AntigenMelanomaMelanoma-Specific AntigensMiddle Agedgp100 Melanoma AntigenHLA-A2 AntigenMART-1 AntigenMelanoma-Specific Antigens

Identifiers

PMID25424856
PMCPMC4315711
OpenAlexW2091918246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.