Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25424497›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2015

Form and function of the intervertebral disc in health and disease: a morphological and stain comparison study.

B A Walter, O M Torre, D Laudier, T P Naidich, A C Hecht, J C Iatridis

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Deletion of aJOR spine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Harnessing CRISPR potential for intervertebral disc regeneration strategies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The role of PIEZO ion channels in the musculoskeletal system.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Cartilage · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Computational Challenges in Tissue Engineering for the Spine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

B A WalterLeni & Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
O M TorreLeni & Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
D LaudierLeni & Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
T P NaidichDepartment of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
A C HechtLeni & Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
J C IatridisLeni & Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Model of Human Disc Regeneration in the spectrum of Degenerative Disc DiseaseR01AR057397 · NIAMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI IATRIDIS, JAMES C. · 2011 to 2021
$5.1M
Notochordal Cell Derived Therapies for Painful Disc DegenerationR01AR064157 · NIAMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI IATRIDIS, JAMES C. · 2013 to 2017
$2.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR057397NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR057397NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR064157NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR064157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple histologic measurements are commonly used to assess degenerative changes in intervertebral disc (IVD) structure; however, there is no consensus on which stains offer the clearest visualization of specific areas within the IVD. The objective of this study was to compare multiple tinctorial stains, evaluate their ability to highlight structural features within the IVD, and investigate how they influence the capacity to implement a degeneration scoring system. Lumbar IVDs from seven human autopsy specimens were stained using six commonly used stains (Hematoxylin/Eosin, Toluidine Blue, Safranin-O/Fast Green, Extended FAST, modified Gomori's Trichrome, and Picrosirius Red Alcian Blue). All IVDs were evaluated by three separate graders to independently determine which stains (i) were most effective at discerning different structural features within different regions of the IVDs and (ii) allowed for the most reproducible assessment of degeneration grade, as assessed via the Rutges histological scoring system (Rutges et al. A validated new histological classification for intervertebral disc degeneration. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 21, 2039-47). Although Trichrome, XFAST and PR/AB stains were all effective at highlighting different regions of whole IVDs, we recommend the use of PR/AB because it had the highest degree of rater agreement on assigned degeneration grade, allowed greater resolution of degeneration grade, has an inferential relationship between color and composition, and allowed clear differentiation of the different regions and structural disruptions within the IVD. The use of a standard set of stains together with a histological grading scheme can aid in the characterization of structural changes in different regions of the IVD and may simplify comparisons across the field. This collection of human IVD histological images highlights how IVD degeneration is not a single disease but a composite of multiple processes such as aging, injury, repair, and disease, each of which are unique to the individual.

Indexed as

AdultAged, 80 and overChildColoring AgentsFemaleHumansIntervertebral DiscIntervertebral Disc DegenerationLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsStaining and LabelingColoring Agentsdegenerationhumanintervertebral discPicrosirius Red/Alcian Blue staining

Identifiers

PMID25424497
PMCPMC4442752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.