Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25424193›Full record

ArticleJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine2017

A bio-artificial renal epithelial cell system conveys survival advantage in a porcine model of septic shock.

Angela J Westover, Deborah A Buffington, Kimberly A Johnston, Peter L Smith, Christopher J Pino, H David Humes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Porcine models of acute kidney injury.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Kidney-on-a-chip: untapped opportunities.Kidney international · 2018
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Bioengineered Renal Cell Therapy Device for Clinical Translation.ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angela J WestoverInnovative BioTherapies Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Deborah A BuffingtonInnovative BioTherapies Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kimberly A JohnstonInnovative BioTherapies Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Peter L SmithInnovative BioTherapies Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Christopher J PinoInnovative BioTherapies Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
H David HumesInnovative BioTherapies Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

TISSUE DISTRIBUTION FOR RARE DISEASE RESEARCHU42RR006042 · NCRR · NATIONAL DISEASE RESEARCH INTERCHANGE · PI LONSDALE, JOHN T · 1991 to 2011
$16.5M
Cell Therapy for Septic ShockR44DK074289 · NIDDK · INNOVATIVE BIOTHERAPIES, INC. · PI BUFFINGTON, DEBORAH ANN · 2008 to 2010
$1.6M
Cell Therapy for Septic ShockR43DK074289 · NIDDK · INNOVATIVE BIOTHERAPIES, INC. · PI BUFFINGTON, DEBORAH A · 2006 to 2007
$500k
Enhanced Propagation of Adult Human Renal Epithelial CellsR43DK082050 · NIDDK · INNOVATIVE BIOTHERAPIES, INC. · PI WESTOVER, ANGELA J · 2008 to 2009
$148k
NCRR NIH HHS U42 RR006042NIDDK NIH HHS R43 DK074289NIDDK NIH HHS R43 DK082050NIDDK NIH HHS R44 DK074289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal cell therapy using the hollow fiber based renal assist device (RAD) improved survival time in an animal model of septic shock (SS) through the amelioration of cardiac and vascular dysfunction. Safety and ability of the RAD to improve clinical outcomes was demonstrated in a Phase II clinical trial, in which patients had high prevalence of sepsis. Even with these promising results, clinical delivery of cell therapy is hampered by manufacturing hurdles, including cell sourcing, large-scale device manufacture, storage and delivery. To address these limitations, the bioartificial renal epithelial cell system (BRECS) was developed. The BRECS contains human renal tubule epithelial cells derived from adult progenitor cells using enhanced propagation techniques. Cells were seeded onto trabeculated disks of niobium-coated carbon, held within cryopreservable, perfusable, injection-moulded polycarbonate housing. The study objective was to evaluate the BRECS in a porcine model of SS to establish conservation of efficacy after necessary cell sourcing and design modifications; a pre-clinical requirement to move back into clinical trials. SS was incited by peritoneal injection of E. coli simultaneous to insertion of BRECS (n=10) or control (n=15), into the ultrafiltrate biofeedback component of an extracorporeal circuit. Comparable to RAD, prolonged survival of the BRECS cohort was conveyed through stabilization of cardiac output and vascular leak. In conclusion, the demonstration of conserved efficacy with BRECS therapy in a porcine SS model represents a crucial step toward returning renal cell therapy to the clinical setting, initially targeting ICU patients with acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Indexed as

AnimalsArtificial OrgansBlood PressureCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalEpithelial CellsEscherichia coliHematocritHemodynamicsKaplan-Meier EstimateKidneyKidney Function TestsShock, SepticSurvival AnalysisSus scrofaCytokinesacute kidney injuryartificial kidneycapillary leak syndromeimmunotherapyseptic shocksystemic inflammatory response syndrometissue therapy

Identifiers

PMID25424193
PMCPMC4945492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.