Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25424131›Full record

Trial reportNature communications2014

Laminar activity in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex related to novelty and episodic encoding.

Anne Maass, Hartmut Schütze, Oliver Speck, Andrew Yonelinas, Claus Tempelmann, Hans-Jochen Heinze, David Berron, Arturo Cardenas-Blanco, Kay H Brodersen, Klaas Enno Stephan and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature communications, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Toward brain-trained humanoid robots.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Insights into hippocampal perfusion using high-resolution, multi-modal 7T MRI.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Anne MaassInstitute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Hartmut SchützeInstitute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Oliver Speck1] Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, Institute of Experimental Physics, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany [2] German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Site Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany [3] Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, 39118 Magdeburg, Germany [4] Center for Behavioral and Brain Sciences, CBBS, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Andrew YonelinasDepartment of Psychology, Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA.
Claus TempelmannDepartment of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Hans-Jochen Heinze1] German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Site Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany [2] Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, 39118 Magdeburg, Germany [3] Center for Behavioral and Brain Sciences, CBBS, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany [4] Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
David BerronInstitute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Arturo Cardenas-BlancoGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Site Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Kay H BrodersenTranslational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich Ð Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.
Klaas Enno Stephan1] Translational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich Ð Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland [2] Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Emrah Düzel1] Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany [2] German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Site Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany [3] Center for Behavioral and Brain Sciences, CBBS, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany [4] Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany [5] Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK.
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DECenter for Behavioral Brain Sciences · DEETH Zurich · CHInstitute for Biomedical Engineering · CHUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Medical Research Council G1002276Wellcome Trust 091593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to form long-term memories for novel events depends on information processing within the hippocampus (HC) and entorhinal cortex (EC). The HC-EC circuitry shows a quantitative segregation of anatomical directionality into different neuronal layers. Whereas superficial EC layers mainly project to dentate gyrus (DG), CA3 and apical CA1 layers, HC output is primarily sent from pyramidal CA1 layers and subiculum to deep EC layers. Here we utilize this directionality information by measuring encoding activity within HC/EC subregions with 7 T high resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Multivariate Bayes decoding within HC/EC subregions shows that processing of novel information most strongly engages the input structures (superficial EC and DG/CA2-3), whereas subsequent memory is more dependent on activation of output regions (deep EC and pyramidal CA1). This suggests that while novelty processing is strongly related to HC-EC input pathways, the memory fate of a novel stimulus depends more on HC-EC output.

Indexed as

AdultEntorhinal CortexFemaleHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemoryNeural PathwaysRadiographyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25424131
PMCPMC4263140
OpenAlexW2170689442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.