Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25423621›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2015

The generating function approach for Peptide identification in spectral networks.

Adrian Guthals, Christina Boucher, Nuno Bandeira

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adrian Guthals1 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California-San Diego , La Jolla, California.
Christina Boucher
Nuno Bandeira
University of California San Diego · USColorado State University · US

Funding

Overall (pp. 40-62)P41GM103485 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CERIONE, RICHARD A. · 2012 to 2018
$15.5M
TrainingP41GM103484 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PEVZNER, PAVEL A · 2012 to 2018
$8.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS 8 P41 GM103485-05NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tandem mass (MS/MS) spectrometry has become the method of choice for protein identification and has launched a quest for the identification of every translated protein and peptide. However, computational developments have lagged behind the pace of modern data acquisition protocols and have become a major bottleneck in proteomics analysis of complex samples. As it stands today, attempts to identify MS/MS spectra against large databases (e.g., the human microbiome or 6-frame translation of the human genome) face a search space that is 10-100 times larger than the human proteome, where it becomes increasingly challenging to separate between true and false peptide matches. As a result, the sensitivity of current state-of-the-art database search methods drops by nearly 38% to such low identification rates that almost 90% of all MS/MS spectra are left as unidentified. We address this problem by extending the generating function approach to rigorously compute the joint spectral probability of multiple spectra being matched to peptides with overlapping sequences, thus enabling the confident assignment of higher significance to overlapping peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs). We find that these joint spectral probabilities can be several orders of magnitude more significant than individual PSMs, even in the ideal case when perfect separation between signal and noise peaks could be achieved per individual MS/MS spectrum. After benchmarking this approach on a typical lysate MS/MS dataset, we show that the proposed intersecting spectral probabilities for spectra from overlapping peptides improve peptide identification by 30-62%.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalSoftwareAlgorithmsComputer SimulationDatabases, ProteinHumansPeptide LibraryPeptidesProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryPeptide LibraryPeptidesalgorithmscomputational molecular biologydatabasesprobabilitystatistical models

Identifiers

PMID25423621
PMCPMC4425220
OpenAlexW2241543795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.