Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25423601›Full record

SynthesisBreastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine

Enhancing breastfeeding rates among African American women: a systematic review of current psychosocial interventions.

Angela Johnson, Rosalind Kirk, Katherine Lisa Rosenblum, Maria Muzik

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy as a Predictor of Breastfeeding Intensity Among African American Women in the Mama Bear Feasibility Trial.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2022
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Pilot Breastfeeding-Supportive Texting Program for African American and Black Mothers.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Breastfeeding among Hispanic and Black Women: Barriers and Support.Journal of biomedical research & environmental sciences · 2023
    Article
  20. Disparities in Infant Nutrition: WIC Participation and Rates of Breastfeeding in Florida.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angela JohnsonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Rosalind Kirk
Katherine Lisa Rosenblum
Maria Muzik
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MCHR)UL1TR000433 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2012 to 2016
$49.9M
NCATS NIH HHS 2UL1TR000433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goals of this article are to provide a review of key interventions and strategies that impact initiation and duration of breastfeeding with particular focus on low-income African American mothers' maternal psychological vulnerabilities during the early postpartum period using a social ecological perspective as a guiding framework. Although modest gains have been achieved in breastfeeding initiation rates in the United States, a projected gap remains between infant feeding practices and national Healthy People breastfeeding goals set for 2020, particularly among African Americans. These disparities raise concerns that socially disadvantaged mothers and babies may be at increased risk for poor postnatal outcomes because of poorer mental health and increased vulnerability to chronic health conditions. Breastfeeding can be a protective factor, strengthening the relationship between mother and baby and increasing infant health and resilience. Evidence suggests that no single intervention can sufficiently address the multiple breastfeeding barriers faced by mothers. Effective intervention strategies require a multilevel approach. A social ecological perspective highlights that individual knowledge, behavior, and attitudes are shaped by interactions between the individual woman, her friends and family, and her wider historical, social, political, economic, institutional, and community contexts, and therefore effective breastfeeding interventions must reflect all these aspects. Current breastfeeding interventions are disjointed and inadequately meet all African American women's social and psychological breastfeeding needs. Poor outcomes indicate a need for an integrative approach to address the complexity of interrelated breastfeeding barriers mothers' experience across layers of the social ecological system.

Indexed as

AdultAnxietyBlack or African AmericanBreast FeedingFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PolicyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMothersSocial SupportSocioeconomic FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25423601
PMCPMC4307211
OpenAlexW2326211971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.