Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25423449›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Molecular characterization of Lactobacillus plantarum DMDL 9010, a strain with efficient nitrite degradation capacity.

Yong-tao Fei, Dong-mei Liu, Tong-hui Luo, Gu Chen, Hui Wu, Li Li, Yi-gang Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Food science and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Genome Investigation and Functional Annotation ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Screening of Endophytic Antagonistic Bacterium fromThe plant pathology journal · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Bacterial overgrowth and diversification of microbiota in gastric cancer.European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2016
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yong-tao FeiCollege of Light Industry and Food Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Dong-mei LiuCollege of Light Industry and Food Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Tong-hui LuoCollege of Light Industry and Food Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Gu ChenCollege of Light Industry and Food Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Hui WuCollege of Light Industry and Food Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Li LiCollege of Light Industry and Food Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yi-gang YuCollege of Light Industry and Food Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitrites commonly found in food, especially in fermented vegetables, are potential carcinogens. Therefore, limiting nitrites in food is critically important for food safety. A Lactobacillus strain (Lactobacillus sp. DMDL 9010) was previously isolated from fermented vegetables by our group, and is not yet fully characterized. A number of phenotypical and genotypical approaches were employed to characterize Lactobacillus sp. DMDL 9010. Its nitrite degradation capacity was compared with four other Lactobacillus strains, including Lactobacillus casei subsp. rhamnosus 719, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricu 1.83, Streptococcus thermophilus 1.204, and lactobacillus plantarum 8140, on MRS medium. Compared to these four Lactobacillus strains, Lactobacillus sp. DMDL 9010 had a significantly higher nitrite degradation capacity (P<0.001). Based on 16S rDNA sequencing and sequence comparison, Lactobacillus sp. DMDL 9010 was identified as either Lactobacillus plantarum or Lactobacillus pentosus. To further identify this strain, the flanking regions (922 bp and 806 bp upstream and downstream, respectively) of the L-lactate dehydrogenase 1 (L-ldh1) gene were amplified and sequenced. Lactobacillus sp. DMDL 9010 had 98.92 and 76.98% sequence identity in the upstream region with L. plantarum WCFS1 and L. pentosus IG1, respectively, suggesting that Lactobacillu sp. DMDL 9010 is an L. plantarum strain. It was therefore named L. plantarum DMDL 9010. Our study provides a platform for genetic engineering of L. plantarum DMDL 9010, in order to further improve its nitrite degradation capacity.

Indexed as

DNA, RibosomalGenes, BacterialLactiplantibacillus plantarumMolecular Sequence DataNitritesPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, RibosomalNitritesRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID25423449
PMCPMC4244150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.