ArticlePloS one2014
GINDEL: accurate genotype calling of insertions and deletions from low coverage population sequence reads.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of the Advances and New Insights into Copy Number Variations in Plant Genomes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- NPSV-deep: a deep learning method for genotyping structural variants in short read genome sequencing data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- NPSV: A simulation-driven approach to genotyping structural variants in whole-genome sequencing data.GigaScience · 2021Article
- Comprehensive identification of transposable element insertions using multiple sequencing technologies.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Identification and Genotyping of Transposable Element Insertions From Genome Sequencing Data.Current protocols in human genetics · 2020Review
- A machine learning framework for genotyping the structural variations with copy number variant.BMC medical genomics · 2020Article
- InvBFM: finding genomic inversions from high-throughput sequence data based on feature mining.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- DeepSV: accurate calling of genomic deletions from high-throughput sequencing data using deep convolutional neural network.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- A high-quality human reference panel reveals the complexity and distribution of genomic structural variants.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Whole-genome CNV analysis: advances in computational approaches.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Review
- SpliceJumper: a classification-based approach for calling splicing junctions from RNA-seq data.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Insertions and deletions (indels) are important types of structural variations. Obtaining accurate genotypes of indels may facilitate further genetic study. There are a few existing methods for calling indel genotypes from sequence reads. However, none of these tools can accurately call indel genotypes for indels of all lengths, especially for low coverage sequence data. In this paper, we present GINDEL, an approach for calling genotypes of both insertions and deletions from sequence reads. GINDEL uses a machine learning approach which combines multiple features extracted from next generation sequencing data. We test our approach on both simulated and real data and compare with existing tools, including Genome STRiP, Pindel and Clever-sv. Results show that GINDEL works well for deletions larger than 50 bp on both high and low coverage data. Also, GINDEL performs well for insertion genotyping on both simulated and real data. For comparison, Genome STRiP performs less well for shorter deletions (50-200 bp) on both simulated and real sequence data from the 1000 Genomes Project. Clever-sv performs well for intermediate deletions (200-1500 bp) but is less accurate when coverage is low. Pindel only works well for high coverage data, but does not perform well at low coverage. To summarize, we show that GINDEL not only can call genotypes of insertions and deletions (both short and long) for high and low coverage population sequence data, but also is more accurate and efficient than other approaches. The program GINDEL can be downloaded at: http://sourceforge.net/p/gindel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.