ArticlePloS one2014
Palliative care among heart failure patients in primary care: a comparison to cancer patients using English family practice data.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Equitable inclusion of patients with cancer on the palliative care register: a systematic review in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Differences in family caregiver experiences and expectations of end-of-life heart failure care across providers and settings: a systematic literature review.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Psychosocial needs and interventions for heart failure patients and families receiving palliative care support: a systematic review.Heart failure reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Out-of-hours primary care management for patients with heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Continuity of primary care and end-of-life care costs in dementia: a retrospective cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026Article
- "Supportive relationships over support services"-A qualitative study of patient and caregiver perspectives on the implementation of community-based palliative care for people living with advanced noncommunicable diseases.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Palliative Care in Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of Its Impact on Symptoms, Quality of Life, and Decision-Making Process.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Holistic symptom burden and prognostic value of palliative care needs in heart failure: insights from the integrated palliative care outcome scale.BMC palliative care · 2025Observational
- Article
- Social determinants of where people die: A study of moderators and mediators using linked UK Census and mortality data.SSM - population health · 2025Article
- Development of a complex palliative care intervention for patients with heart failure and their family carers: a theory of change approach.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Palliative care for cardiovascular patients: comparison of the motives of referral by cardiologists and the actual care provided by the mobile palliative care team.European geriatric medicine · 2025Article
- Prescription of essential medication during the final hospitalization of patients with heart failure or cancer.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Validity and reliability of the palliative care needs assessment tool in Japanese patients with heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- The experiences of patients with advanced heart failure, family carers, and health professionals with palliative care services: a secondary reflexive thematic analysis of longitudinal interview data.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- When should Home-visit nurses initiate end-of-life discussions for patients with Organ failure and family caregivers? A qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2023Article
- Article
- A pilot study on the effect of advance care planning implementation on healthcare utilisation and satisfaction in patients with advanced heart failure.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPatients with heart failure have a significant symptom burden and other palliative care needs often over a longer period than patients with cancer. It is acknowledged that this need may be unmet but by how much has not been quantified in primary care data at the population level.
methodsThis was the first use of Clinical Practice Research Datalink, the world's largest primary care database to explore recognition of the need for palliative care. Heart failure and cancer patients who had died in 2009 aged 18 or over and had at least one year of primary care records were identified. A palliative approach to care among patients with heart failure was compared to that among patients with cancer using entry onto a palliative care register as a marker for a palliative approach to care.
resultsAmong patients with heart failure, 7% (234/3 122) were entered on the palliative care register compared to 48% (3 669/7 608) of cancer patients. Of heart failure patients on the palliative care register, 29% (69/234) were entered onto the register within a week of their death.
conclusionsThis confirms that the stark inequity in recognition of palliative care needs for people with heart failure in a large primary care dataset. We recommend a move away from prognosis based criteria for palliative care towards a patient centred approach, with assessment of and attention to palliative needs including advance care planning throughout the disease trajectory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.