Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25423045›Full record

ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2014

Residual infestation and recolonization during urban Triatoma infestans Bug Control Campaign, Peru.

Corentin M Barbu, Alison M Buttenheim, Maria-Luz Hancco Pumahuanca, Javier E Quintanilla Calderón, Renzo Salazar, Malwina Carrión, Andy Catacora Rospigliossi, Fernando S Malaga Chavez, Karina Oppe Alvarez, Juan Cornejo del Carpio and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Risk maps for cities: Incorporating streets into geostatistical models.Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Corentin M Barbu
Alison M Buttenheim
Maria-Luz Hancco Pumahuanca
Javier E Quintanilla Calderón
Renzo Salazar
Malwina Carrión
Andy Catacora Rospigliossi
Fernando S Malaga Chavez
Karina Oppe Alvarez
Juan Cornejo del Carpio
César Náquira
Michael Z Levy

Funding

Infrastructure for Population Research at PrincetonR24HD047879 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MASSEY, DOUGLAS S · 2004 to 2013
$7.3M
CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR POPULATION TRAINING PROGRAMT32HD007545 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HIRAM BELTRAN-SANCHEZ, Megan M Sweeney · 2001 to 2026
$4.1M
The ecology and epidemiology of Chagas disease in urban and rural communitiesP50AI074285 · NIAID · UNIVERSIDAD PERUANA CAYETANO HEREDIA · PI GARCIA, HECTOR HUGO · 2007 to 2011
$3.2M
Disrupting Vector-borne Disease Transmission in Complex Urban EnvironmentsR01AI101229 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LEVY, MICHAEL Z · 2013 to 2017
$3.1M
Improving participation in vector control campaigns R01HD075869 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BUTTENHEIM, ALISON MEREDITH, LEVY, MICHAEL Z · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
Mathematical Techniques for Control of Epidemic Trypanosoma cruzi TransmissionK01AI079162 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LEVY, MICHAEL Z · 2008 to 2012
$602k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI079162NIAID NIH HHS P50 AI074285NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI101229NIAID NIH HHS R01AI101229NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075869NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD047879NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chagas disease vector control campaigns are being conducted in Latin America, but little is known about medium-term or long-term effectiveness of these efforts, especially in urban areas. After analyzing entomologic data for 56,491 households during the treatment phase of a Triatoma infestans bug control campaign in Arequipa, Peru, during 2003-2011, we estimated that 97.1% of residual infestations are attributable to untreated households. Multivariate models for the surveillance phase of the campaign obtained during 2009-2012 confirm that nonparticipation in the initial treatment phase is a major risk factor (odds ratio [OR] 21.5, 95% CI 3.35-138). Infestation during surveillance also increased over time (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.15-2.09 per year). In addition, we observed a negative interaction between nonparticipation and time (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53-0.99), suggesting that recolonization by vectors progressively dilutes risk associated with nonparticipation. Although the treatment phase was effective, recolonization in untreated households threatens the long-term success of vector control.

Indexed as

Health PromotionInsect ControlTriatomaUrban HealthAnimalsChagas DiseaseGeographyHumansInsecticidesPeruPublic Health SurveillanceRisk FactorsInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID25423045
PMCPMC4257819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.