ArticleSouth Asian journal of cancer2014
Response to imatinib mesylate in childhood chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase.
Article in South Asian journal of cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The prevalence of hepatic and thyroid toxicity associated with imatinib treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia: a systematic review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2024Pooled it
- Front-line imatinib treatment in children and adolescents with chronic myeloid leukemia: results from a phase III trial.Leukemia · 2018Trial
- Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in pediatric chronic myeloid leukemia: a focused review of clinical trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Infectious Complications of Targeted Therapies in Children with Leukemias and Lymphomas.Cancers · 2022Review
- Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in India.Journal of global oncology · 2017Review
- Chronic myeloid leukemia in children, do we have all the answers?South Asian journal of cancer · 2014Article
- Effectiveness of Three Prognostic Scoring Systems in Predicting the Response and Outcome in Pediatric Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Chronic Phase on Frontline Imatinib.Indian journal of medical and paediatric oncology : official journal of Indian Society of Medical & Paediatric OncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChildhood chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) accounts for less than 3% of all childhood leukemias, hence, data on imatinib (IM) in adult CML patients has been largely extrapolated to children. We have analyzed our data to add to the existing literature.
aimsPrimary objective is to assess the progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objective are cytogenetic response, overall survival (OS), and toxicities. SETTINGS AND
designThis is a retrospective analysis from the case records from a single institution. MATERIALS AND
methodsInstitutional ethics committee approval was obtained. All the children diagnosed CML in chronic phase (CML-CP) aged less than 18 years registered between 2000 and 2009 were enrolled. All the patients were started on IM at 260 mg/m(2). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Kaplan-Meier curves were used to calculate the PFS and OS.
resultsThere were 64 children with median age of 13 years (range, 1-18) with male predominance (male:female (M: F) - 1.85:1). Sixty-one patients (95.4%) achieved complete hematological response (CHR) at median of 8 weeks. Thirty-seven (57.8%) patients had evaluation of cytogenetic response and were subjects for outcome analysis. The median time to best cytogenetic response evaluation was 13 months (range, 4-52). Twenty-nine patients (78.3%) achieved complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). At a median follow-up of 36 months (range 5-75), 21 (56.8%) remained progression free and 35 (94.5%) are alive. Adverse events were tolerable.
conclusionsPFS at a median follow-up of 36 months is 56.8% and OS 94.5%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.