Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25422641›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2014

Key changes in denervated muscles and their impact on regeneration and reinnervation.

Peng Wu, Aditya Chawla, Robert J Spinner, Cong Yu, Michael J Yaszemski, Anthony J Windebank, Huan Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Heterologous fibrin biopolymer as an emerging approach to peripheral nerve repair: a scoping review.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Serum neurofilament light chain measurements following nerve trauma.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peng WuDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA ; Department of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China ; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Aditya ChawlaDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA ; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Robert J SpinnerDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Cong YuDepartment of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Michael J YaszemskiDepartments of Orthopedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Anthony J WindebankDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Huan WangDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA ; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Peripheral Nerve and Microsurgery, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neuromuscular junction becomes progressively less receptive to regenerating axons if nerve repair is delayed for a long period of time. It is difficult to ascertain the denervated muscle's residual receptivity by time alone. Other sensitive markers that closely correlate with the extent of denervation should be found. After a denervated muscle develops a fibrillation potential, muscle fiber conduction velocity, muscle fiber diameter, muscle wet weight, and maximal isometric force all decrease; remodeling increases neuromuscular junction fragmentation and plantar area, and expression of myogenesis-related genes is initially up-regulated and then down-regulated. All these changes correlate with both the time course and degree of denervation. The nature and time course of these denervation changes in muscle are reviewed from the literature to explore their roles in assessing both the degree of detrimental changes and the potential success of a nerve repair. Fibrillation potential amplitude, muscle fiber conduction velocity, muscle fiber diameter, mRNA expression levels of myogenic regulatory factors and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor could all reflect the severity and length of denervation and the receptiveness of denervated muscle to regenerating axons, which could possibly offer an important clue for surgical choices and predict the outcomes of delayed nerve repair.

Indexed as

denervationfibrillation potentialgene expressionmaximal isometric forcemuscle fiber conduction velocitymuscle fiber diameternerve regenerationneural regenerationneuromuscular junctionreinnervation

Identifiers

PMID25422641
PMCPMC4239769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.