Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25422461›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Phylogenetic reconstruction of Bantu kinship challenges Main Sequence Theory of human social evolution.

Christopher Opie, Susanne Shultz, Quentin D Atkinson, Thomas Currie, Ruth Mace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetic and linguistic comparisons reveal complex sex-biased transmission of language features.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Phylogenetic insight into the origin of tones.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A worldwide view of matriliny: using cross-cultural analyses to shed light on human kinship systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  14. The disequilibrium of double descent: changing inheritance norms among Himba pastoralists.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  15. Differences between sons and daughters in the intergenerational transmission of wealth.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The expendable male hypothesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  18. Coevolution of landesque capital intensive agriculture and sociopolitical hierarchy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Hunter-Gatherers and the Origins of Religion.Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.) · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher OpieDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, London WC1H 0BW, United Kingdom; kit.opie@ucl.ac.uk.
Susanne ShultzFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom;
Quentin D AtkinsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand; and.
Thomas CurrieCentre for Ecology & Conservation, College of Life & Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Cornwall TR10 9FE, United Kingdom.
Ruth MaceDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, London WC1H 0BW, United Kingdom;ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6137-7739

Funding

European Research Council 249347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kinship provides the fundamental structure of human society: descent determines the inheritance pattern between generations, whereas residence rules govern the location a couple moves to after they marry. In turn, descent and residence patterns determine other key relationships such as alliance, trade, and marriage partners. Hunter-gatherer kinship patterns are viewed as flexible, whereas agricultural societies are thought to have developed much more stable kinship patterns as they expanded during the Holocene. Among the Bantu farmers of sub-Saharan Africa, the ancestral kinship patterns present at the beginning of the expansion are hotly contested, with some arguing for matrilineal and matrilocal patterns, whereas others maintain that any kind of lineality or sex-biased dispersal only emerged much later. Here, we use Bayesian phylogenetic methods to uncover the history of Bantu kinship patterns and trace the interplay between descent and residence systems. The results suggest a number of switches in both descent and residence patterns as Bantu farming spread, but that the first Bantu populations were patrilocal with patrilineal descent. Across the phylogeny, a change in descent triggered a switch away from patrifocal kinship, whereas a change in residence triggered a switch back from matrifocal kinship. These results challenge "Main Sequence Theory," which maintains that changes in residence rules precede change in other social structures. We also indicate the trajectory of kinship change, shedding new light on how this fundamental structure of society developed as farming spread across the globe during the Neolithic.

Indexed as

Black PeoplePhylogenySocial BehaviorAfrica South of the SaharaBayes TheoremBiological EvolutionFemaleGeographyHumansLanguageMaleMarriageMonte Carlo MethodProbabilityResidence CharacteristicsBantuBayesiankinshipNeolithicphylogenetics

Identifiers

PMID25422461
PMCPMC4267395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.