Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25422454›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Brain-machine interface for eye movements.

Arnulf B A Graf, Richard A Andersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arnulf B A GrafDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 graf@vis.caltech.edu andersen@vis.caltech.edu.
Richard A AndersenDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 graf@vis.caltech.edu andersen@vis.caltech.edu.

Funding

NEURAL PROSTHESIS USING POSTERIOR PARIETAL REACH REGIONR01EY013337 · NEI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ANDERSEN, RICHARD A · 2001 to 2015
$6.5M
Visual/Spatial Properties of Posterior Parietal NeuronsR01EY005522 · NEI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI ANDERSEN, RICHARD A · 1985 to 2011
$5.7M
VISUAL MOTION PROCESSINGR01EY007492 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ANDERSEN, RICHARD A · 1987 to 2014
$4.7M
NEI NIH HHS EY005522NEI NIH HHS EY007492NEI NIH HHS EY013337NEI NIH HHS R01 EY005522NEI NIH HHS R01 EY007492NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of studies in tetraplegic humans and healthy nonhuman primates (NHPs) have shown that neuronal activity from reach-related cortical areas can be used to predict reach intentions using brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) and therefore assist tetraplegic patients by controlling external devices (e.g., robotic limbs and computer cursors). However, to our knowledge, there have been no studies that have applied BMIs to eye movement areas to decode intended eye movements. In this study, we recorded the activity from populations of neurons from the lateral intraparietal area (LIP), a cortical node in the NHP saccade system. Eye movement plans were predicted in real time using Bayesian inference from small ensembles of LIP neurons without the animal making an eye movement. Learning, defined as an increase in the prediction accuracy, occurred at the level of neuronal ensembles, particularly for difficult predictions. Population learning had two components: an update of the parameters of the BMI based on its history and a change in the responses of individual neurons. These results provide strong evidence that the responses of neuronal ensembles can be shaped with respect to a cost function, here the prediction accuracy of the BMI. Furthermore, eye movement plans could be decoded without the animals emitting any actual eye movements and could be used to control the position of a cursor on a computer screen. These findings show that BMIs for eye movements are promising aids for assisting paralyzed patients.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesAnimalsBayes TheoremBehaviorBrainElectrodesEye MovementsHaplorhiniHumansLearningMaleNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeuronsParalysisParietal LobeReproducibility of Resultsbrain–machine interfaceeye movementslateral intraparietal arealearningsaccades

Identifiers

PMID25422454
PMCPMC4267382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.