Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25422444›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Body ownership causes illusory self-attribution of speaking and influences subsequent real speaking.

Domna Banakou, Mel Slater

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07283523 (The Use of Virtual Reality to Combat Weight-Based Implicit Bias Among Physicians in Training at Brigham and Women's Hospital), which is not on this map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07283523 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Use of Virtual Reality to Combat Weight-Based Implicit Bias Among Physicians in Training at Brigham and Women's Hospital: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled52ConditionsImplicit Bias, Implicit Association TestArms360 Video on a Virtual Reality Headset, 360-Control Video
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 217 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Domna BanakouExperimental Virtual Environments for Neuroscience and Technology Laboratory, Department of Personality, Evaluation, and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, and Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, University of Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain;
Mel SlaterExperimental Virtual Environments for Neuroscience and Technology Laboratory, Department of Personality, Evaluation, and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, and Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, University of Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, 08010 Barcelona, Spain; and Department of Computer Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom melslater@ub.edu.
Faculty (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

European Research Council 227985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When we carry out an act, we typically attribute the action to ourselves, the sense of agency. Explanations for agency include conscious prior intention to act, followed by observation of the sensory consequences; brain activity that involves the feed-forward prediction of the consequences combined with rapid inverse motor prediction to fine-tune the action in real time; priming where there is, e.g., a prior command to perform the act; a cause (the intention to act) preceding the effect (the results of the action); and common-sense rules of attribution of physical causality satisfied. We describe an experiment where participants falsely attributed an act to themselves under conditions that apparently cannot be explained by these theories. A life-sized virtual body (VB) seen from the first-person perspective in 3D stereo, as if substituting the real body, was used to induce the illusion of ownership over the VB. Half of the 44 experimental participants experienced VB movements that were synchronous with their own movements (sync), and the other half asynchronous (async). The VB, seen in a mirror, spoke with corresponding lip movements, and for half of the participants this was accompanied by synchronous vibrotactile stimulation on the thyroid cartilage (Von) but this was not so for the other half. Participants experiencing sync misattributed the speaking to themselves and also shifted the fundamental frequency of their later utterances toward the stimulus voice. Von also contributed to these results. We show that these findings can be explained by current theories of agency, provided that the critical role of ownership over the VB is taken into account.

Indexed as

SpeechVoiceAdultBody ImageBrainCartilageFemaleHandHumansIllusionsMalePerceptionProprioceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesThyroid GlandUser-Computer Interfaceagencybody-ownership illusionillusory speakingrubber-hand illusionvibrotactile stimulation

Identifiers

PMID25422444
PMCPMC4267370
OpenAlexW2161328799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.