Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25422413›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Functional differences between neurotransmitter binding sites of muscle acetylcholine receptors.

Tapan K Nayak, Iva Bruhova, Srirupa Chakraborty, Shaweta Gupta, Wenjun Zheng, Anthony Auerbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cyclic activation of endplate acetylcholine receptors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tapan K NayakDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214; and.
Iva BruhovaDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214; and.
Srirupa ChakrabortyDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214; and Department of Physics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260.
Shaweta GuptaDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214; and.
Wenjun ZhengDepartment of Physics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260.
Anthony AuerbachDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214; and auerbach@buffalo.edu.

Funding

MULTIPLE ACTIVITY PATTERNS OF ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTORSR37NS023513 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI AUERBACH, ANTHONY L · 2000 to 2013
$6.9M
Engineering a Transmitter Binding SiteR01NS064969 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI AUERBACH, ANTHONY L · 2009 to 2018
$4.1M
Multiple Activity Patterns of Acetylcholine ReceptorsR56NS023513 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI AUERBACH, ANTHONY L · 2014 to 2014
$530k
MULTIPLE ACTIVITY PATTERNS OF ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTORSR01NS023513 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI AUERBACH, ANTHONY L · 1987 to 1999
–
NINDS NIH HHS NS023513NINDS NIH HHS NS064969NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS023513NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS064969NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS023513NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS023513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A muscle acetylcholine receptor (AChR) has two neurotransmitter binding sites located in the extracellular domain, at αδ and either αε (adult) or αγ (fetal) subunit interfaces. We used single-channel electrophysiology to measure the effects of mutations of five conserved aromatic residues at each site with regard to their contribution to the difference in free energy of agonist binding to active versus resting receptors (ΔGB1). The two binding sites behave independently in both adult and fetal AChRs. For four different agonists, including ACh and choline, ΔGB1 is ∼-2 kcal/mol more favorable at αγ compared with at αε and αδ. Only three of the aromatics contribute significantly to ΔGB1 at the adult sites (αY190, αY198, and αW149), but all five do so at αγ (as well as αY93 and γW55). γW55 makes a particularly large contribution only at αγ that is coupled energetically to those contributions of some of the α-subunit aromatics. The hydroxyl and benzene groups of loop C residues αY190 and αY198 behave similarly with regard to ΔGB1 at all three kinds of site. ACh binding energies estimated from molecular dynamics simulations are consistent with experimental values from electrophysiology and suggest that the αγ site is more compact, better organized, and less dynamic than αε and αδ. We speculate that the different sensitivities of the fetal αγ site versus the adult αε and αδ sites to choline and ACh are important for the proper maturation and function of the neuromuscular synapse.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAnimalsBinding SitesCholineComputer SimulationElectrophysiologyGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHEK293 CellsHumansHydrolysisLigandsLymnaeaMiceMolecular ConformationMolecular Dynamics SimulationMusclesAcetylcholineCholineLigandsNeurotransmitter AgentsReceptors, CholinergicTryptophanallosteric proteinion channelligand binding sitessingle-channel electrophysiologysynaptic maturation

Identifiers

PMID25422413
PMCPMC4267328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.