ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2015
Label-free, three-dimensional multiphoton microscopy of the connective tissue in the anterior vaginal wall.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mouse Knockout Models for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: a Systematic Review.International urogynecology journal · 2022Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisMultiphoton microscopy (MPM) is a nonlinear, high-resolution laser scanning technique and a powerful approach for analyzing the spatial architecture within tissues. To demonstrate the potential of this technique for studying the extracellular matrix of the pelvic organs, we aimed to establish protocols for the detection of collagen and elastin in the vagina and to compare the MPM density of these fibers to fibers detected using standard histological methods.
methodsSamples of the anterior vaginal wall were obtained from nine patients undergoing a hysterectomy or cystocele repair. Samples were shock frozen, fixed with formaldehyde or Thiel's solution, or left untreated. Samples were imaged with MPM to quantify the amount of collagen and elastin via second harmonic generation and autofluorescence, respectively. In six patients, sample sections were also histologically stained and imaged with brightfield microscopy. The density of the fibers was quantified using the StereoInvestigator and Cavalieri software.
resultsWith MPM, collagen and elastin could be visualized to a depth of 100 μm, and no overlap of signals was detected. The different tissue processing protocols used did not result in significantly different fiber counts after MPM. MPM-based fiber quantifications are comparable to those based on conventional histological stains. However, MPM provided superior resolution, particularly of collagen fibers.
conclusionsMPM is a robust, rapid, and label-free method that can be used to quantify the collagen and elastin content in thick specimens of the vagina. It is an excellent tool for future three-dimensional studies of the extracellular matrix in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.