Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25421852›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2014

Dissecting the organ specificity of insecticide resistance candidate genes in Anopheles gambiae: known and novel candidate genes.

Victoria A Ingham, Christopher M Jones, Patricia Pignatelli, Vasileia Balabanidou, John Vontas, Simon C Wagstaff, Jonathan D Moore, Hilary Ranson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanisms of transcriptional regulation inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Level of involvement of four selected cytochrome P450s (CYPs) in pyrethroid-resistantCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2024
    Article
  5. Mechanisms of transcriptional regulation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Functional genetic validation of key genes conferring insecticide resistance in the major African malaria vector,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Rapid selection of a pyrethroid metabolic enzyme CYP9K1 by operational malaria control activities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Victoria A InghamDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L35QA, UK. v.ingham@warwick.ac.uk.
Christopher M Jones
Patricia Pignatelli
Vasileia Balabanidou
John Vontas
Simon C Wagstaff
Jonathan D Moore
Hilary Ranson
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Crete · GRUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe elevated expression of enzymes with insecticide metabolism activity can lead to high levels of insecticide resistance in the malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae. In this study, adult female mosquitoes from an insecticide susceptible and resistant strain were dissected into four different body parts. RNA from each of these samples was used in microarray analysis to determine the enrichment patterns of the key detoxification gene families within the mosquito and to identify additional candidate insecticide resistance genes that may have been overlooked in previous experiments on whole organisms.

resultsA general enrichment in the transcription of genes from the four major detoxification gene families (carboxylesterases, glutathione transferases, UDP glucornyltransferases and cytochrome P450s) was observed in the midgut and malpighian tubules. Yet the subset of P450 genes that have previously been implicated in insecticide resistance in An gambiae, show a surprisingly varied profile of tissue enrichment, confirmed by qPCR and, for three candidates, by immunostaining. A stringent selection process was used to define a list of 105 genes that are significantly (p ≤0.001) over expressed in body parts from the resistant versus susceptible strain. Over half of these, including all the cytochrome P450s on this list, were identified in previous whole organism comparisons between the strains, but several new candidates were detected, notably from comparisons of the transcriptomes from dissected abdomen integuments.

conclusionsThe use of RNA extracted from the whole organism to identify candidate insecticide resistance genes has a risk of missing candidates if key genes responsible for the phenotype have restricted expression within the body and/or are over expression only in certain tissues. However, as transcription of genes implicated in metabolic resistance to insecticides is not enriched in any one single organ, comparison of the transcriptome of individual dissected body parts cannot be recommended as a preferred means to identify new candidate insecticide resistant genes. Instead the rich data set on in vivo sites of transcription should be consulted when designing follow up qPCR validation steps, or for screening known candidates in field populations.

Indexed as

Genes, InsectAnimalsAnophelesCluster AnalysisCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemGene Expression ProfilingInsecticide ResistanceInsecticidesOrgan SpecificityReproducibility of ResultsTranscription, GeneticTranscriptomeCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID25421852
PMCPMC4256904
OpenAlexW2135073930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.