Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25421472›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Analysis of the phase 3 ESTABLISH trials of tedizolid versus linezolid in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.

Andrew F Shorr, Thomas P Lodise, G Ralph Corey, Carisa De Anda, Edward Fang, Anita F Das, Philippe Prokocimer

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01170221 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of 6-Day Oral TR-701 Free Acid and 10-Day Oral Linezolid for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections

TypeinterventionalSponsorTrius Therapeutics LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)Ran2010 to 2011Enrolled667ConditionsSkin and Subcutaneous Tissue Bacterial InfectionsArmsTR-701 FA, Linezolid
NCT01421511 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of IV to Oral 6-Day TR-701 Free Acid and IV to Oral 10-Day Linezolid for the Treatment of ABSSSI

TypeinterventionalSponsorTrius Therapeutics LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)Ran2011 to 2013Enrolled666ConditionsSkin and Subcutaneous Tissue Bacterial InfectionsArmsTR-701 FA, Linezolid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Efficacy, safety, tolerability and population pharmacokinetics of tedizolid, a novel antibiotic, in Latino patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Therapy ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Treatment of MRSA Infection: Where are We?Current medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Tedizolid: new data and experiences for clinical practice.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew F ShorrPulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Thomas P LodiseAlbany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, New York, USA.
G Ralph CoreyDuke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Carisa De AndaCubist Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, California, USA.
Edward FangCubist Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, California, USA.
Anita F DasInClin, Inc., San Mateo, California, USA.
Philippe ProkocimerCubist Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, California, USA philippe.prokocimer@cubist.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tedizolid, a novel oxazolidinone with activity against a wide range of Gram-positive pathogens, was evaluated in two noninferiority phase 3 acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection trials. The data from individual trials showed its noninferior efficacy compared to that of linezolid and a favorable tolerability profile. To evaluate potential differences, the pooled data were analyzed. The patients received 200 mg of tedizolid once daily for 6 days or 600 mg of linezolid twice daily for 10 days. Efficacy was evaluated at 48 to 72 h (primary endpoint), on days 11 to 13 (end of therapy [EOT]), and 7 to 14 days after the EOT (posttherapy evaluation). Treatment-emergent adverse events and hematologic and clinical laboratory parameters were collected. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the treatment groups: 852/1,333 (64%) patients were from North America, and the majority of infections were caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Tedizolid was noninferior to linezolid (early clinical responses, 81.6% versus 79.4%, respectively). The early responses remained relatively consistent across various host/disease factors and severity measures. Nausea was the most frequently reported adverse event (tedizolid, 8.2%; linezolid, 12.2%; P=0.02), with onset occurring primarily during the first 6 days. Fewer tedizolid than linezolid patients had platelet counts of <150,000 cells/mm3 at the EOT (tedizolid, 4.9%; linezolid, 10.8%; P=0.0003) and during the postbaseline period through the last day of active drug visit (tedizolid, 6.4%; linezolid, 12.6%; P=0.0016). Efficacy was achieved with a 6-day once-daily course of therapy with the option of an intravenous/oral regimen, and fewer low platelet counts and gastrointestinal side effects were reported with tedizolid than with linezolid, all of which aligns well with antimicrobial stewardship principles. (These studies have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01170221 and NCT01421511.).

Indexed as

AcetamidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLinezolidMaleOxazolidinonesSkin Diseases, BacterialSkin Diseases, InfectiousStaphylococcal Skin InfectionsTetrazolesAcetamidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsLinezolidOxazolidinonestedizolidTetrazoles

Identifiers

PMID25421472
PMCPMC4335893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.