Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25421445›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2015

Early referral makes the decision-making about fertility preservation easier: a pilot survey study of young female cancer survivors.

Jayeon Kim, Jennifer E Mersereau

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Geographic Access to Fertility Counseling among Adolescent and Young Adult Women with Cancer in North Carolina.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fertility preservation in pediatric and young adult female cancer patients.Annals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. "My choice": breast cancer patients recollect doctors fertility preservation recommendations.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Young female cancer survivors' use of fertility care after completing cancer treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  15. Occurrence and recall rates of fertility discussions with young breast cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jayeon KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4001 Old Clinic Building, CB 7570, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7570, USA.
Jennifer E Mersereau
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the study was to investigate the association between patients' decision-making about fertility preservation (FP) and time between cancer diagnosis and FP consultation in young female cancer survivors.

methodsThis is a pilot survey study of women aged 18-43 years seen for FP consultation between April 2009 and December 2010.

resultsAmong 52 women who completed the survey, 15 (29 %) had their FP consultation more than 2 weeks after their cancer diagnosis (late referral group) and 37 (71 %) were within 2 weeks of their cancer diagnosis (early referral group). In univariate analysis, the only difference between the late referral and early referral groups was a higher decisional conflict scale (DCS) in late referral group (p = 0.04). In multivariable analysis, late referral group was more likely to have high DCS (>35) compared to early referral group (odds ratio 4.8, 95 % confidence interval 1.5, 21.6) after adjusting for age, center, and type of cancer.

conclusionEarly referral to a fertility specialist can help patients make better decision about FP. This is the first study to suggest that early referral is important in patients' decision-making process about FP treatment. Our finding supports the benefit of early referral in patients who are interested in FP which is consistent with prior studies about FP referral patterns.

Indexed as

Decision MakingFertility PreservationReferral and ConsultationAdolescentAdultFemaleFertilityHumansNeoplasmsOdds RatioPilot ProjectsSurvivorsTime

Identifiers

PMID25421445
OpenAlexW1998793840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.