Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25421389›Full record

ReviewMicrobial ecology2015

Chironomid microbiome.

Malka Halpern, Yigal Senderovich

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial ecology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Chironomid association withMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Microorganisms · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Otitis Media Caused byFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  16. Fish as Hosts ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Review
  17. Chironomids' Relationship with Aeromonas Species.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Malka HalpernDepartment of Biology and Environment, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Haifa, Oranim, Tivon, Israel, mhalpern@research.haifa.ac.il.
Yigal Senderovich

Funding

PHS HHS ILB1-7045-HA-11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chironomids are abundant insects in freshwater habitats. They undergo a complete metamorphosis of four life stages: eggs, larvae, and pupae in water, and a terrestrial adult stage. Chironomids are known to be pollution-tolerant, but little is known about their resistance mechanisms to toxic substances. Here we review current knowledge regarding the chironomid microbiome. Chironomids were found as natural reservoirs of Vibrio cholerae and Aeromonas spp. A stable bacterial community was found in the egg masses and the larvae when both culture-dependent and -independent methods were used. A large portion of the endogenous bacterial species was closely related to species known as toxicant degraders. Bioassays based on Koch's postulates demonstrated that the chironomid microbiome plays a role in protecting its host from toxic hexavalent chromium and lead. V. cholerae, a stable resident in chironomids, is present at low prevalence. It degrades the egg masses by secreting haemagglutinin/protease, prevents eggs from hatching, and exhibits host pathogen interactions with chironomids. However, the nutrients from the degraded egg masses may support the growth of the other microbiome members and consequently control V. cholerae numbers in the egg mass. V. cholerae, other chironomid endogenous bacteria, and their chironomid host exhibit complex mutualistic relationships.

Indexed as

AeromonasAnimalsChironomidaeLife Cycle StagesMicrobiotaQuorum SensingSpecies SpecificityVibrio cholerae

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.