Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25421300›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2016

Prognostic factors in metastatic gastric cancer: results of a population-based, retrospective cohort study in Ontario.

Matthew Dixon, Alyson L Mahar, Lucy K Helyer, Jovanka Vasilevska-Ristovska, Calvin Law, Natalie G Coburn

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of factors associated with the patient and diagnostic intervals in gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. NCancer communications (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Geographic impact on access to care and survival for non-curative esophagogastric cancer: a population-based study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Economic impacts of care by high-volume providers for non-curative esophagogastric cancer: a population-based analysis.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew DixonDepartment of Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Alyson L MaharDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Lucy K HelyerDepartment of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Jovanka Vasilevska-RistovskaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Suite T2-60, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
Calvin LawDivision of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Suite T2-60, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
Natalie G CoburnDivision of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Suite T2-60, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada. natalie.coburn@sunnybrook.ca.
Health Sciences Centre · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CADalhousie University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStage IV gastric cancer is lethal, and little population-based research on prognostic factors has been performed in low-incidence countries. Therefore, we investigated the consistency of the associations of patient, disease and healthcare system factors identified in previous population-based research to understand their generalizability to other low-incidence populations.

methodsA population-based, retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with Stage IV gastric cancer in Ontario between 1 April 2005 and 31 March 2008 was performed. Kaplan-Meier methodology and the log-rank test were used for bivariate analysis. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression was performed. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented.

resultsOn multivariate analysis, patient, disease and healthcare system factors were independent predictors of survival. Increasing age per 10 years (HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02-1.10), a tumor located in the gastroesophageal junction (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.94-1.27) or middle of the stomach (HR 1.14; 95% CI 0.97-1.35), presence of carcinomatosis (HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.42-1.83) and a larger burden of metastatic disease (2-3 sites of metastatic disease: HR 1.17; 95% CI 1.03-1.32; ≥ 4 sites: HR 1.69; 95% CI 1.30-2.20) were associated with worse prognosis. Female gender, receipt of surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy and treatment from a high-volume, gastric cancer specialist were all associated with significantly better prognosis. In addition, there was evidence of significant geographic variation in survival.

conclusionThis study provides supporting evidence for patient, disease and healthcare system prognostic factors in metastatic gastric cancer. Future work investigating the role of emerging molecular and biologic information will need to take these established prognostic factors into consideration.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinomaCohort StudiesEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPrognosisRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsYoung AdultMetastatic cancerPrognostic factor

Identifiers

PMID25421300
OpenAlexW1983542370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.