Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25421082›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie2014

The location of surgical care for rural patients with rectal cancer: patterns of treatment and patient perspectives.

Michelle C Nostedt, Andrew M McKay, David J Hochman, Debrah A Wirtzfeld, Clifford S Yaffe, Benson Yip, Richard Silverman, Jason Park

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Cancer-related care for rural and remote populations in Canada: A scoping review.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Pediatric Cancers among Alaska Native People.The Journal of pediatrics · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michelle C NostedtFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.
Andrew M McKayFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.
David J HochmanFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.
Debrah A WirtzfeldFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.
Clifford S YaffeFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.
Benson YipFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.
Richard SilvermanFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.
Jason ParkFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.
University of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhere cancer patients receive surgical care has implications on policy and planning and on patients' satisfaction and outcomes. We conducted a population- based analysis of where rectal cancer patients undergo surgery and a qualitative analysis of rectal cancer patients' perspectives on location of surgical care.

methodsWe reviewed Manitoba Cancer Registry data on patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed between 2004 and 2006. We interviewed rural patients with rectal cancer regarding their preferences and the factors they considered when deciding on treatment location. Interview data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach.

resultsFrom 2004 to 2006, 2086 patients received diagnoses of CRC in Manitoba (colon: 1578, rectal: 508). Among rural patients (n = 907), those with rectal cancer were more likely to undergo surgery at an urban centre than those with colon cancer (46.5% v. 28.8%, p < 0.001). Twenty rural patients with rectal cancer participated in interviews. We identified 3 major themes from the interview data: the decision-maker, treatment factors and personal factors. Participants described varying input into referral decisions, and often they did not perceive a choice regarding treatment location. Treatment factors, including surgeon factors and hospital factors, were important when considering treatment location. Personal factors, including travel, support, accommodation, finances and employment, also affected participants' treatment experiences.

conclusionA substantial proportion of rural patients with rectal cancer undergo surgery at urban centres. The reasons are complex and only partly related to patient choice. Further studies are required to better understand cancer system access in geographically dispersed populations and to support cancer patients through the decision-making and treatment processes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleManitobaMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareRectal NeoplasmsRegistriesRural Population

Identifiers

PMID25421082
PMCPMC4245270
OpenAlexW2041360663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.