Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25420722›Full record

ArticleImmunology and cell biology2015

The pool of preactivated Lck in the initiation of T-cell signaling: a critical re-evaluation of the Lck standby model.

Ondřej Ballek, Jan Valečka, Jasper Manning, Dominik Filipp

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Immunology and cell biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. CD147 regulates CD8iScience · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The kinase occupancy of T cell coreceptors reconsidered.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Lck bound to coreceptor is less active than free Lck.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Structural understanding of T cell receptor triggering.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Dual Role of CD4 in Peripheral T Lymphocytes.Frontiers in immunology · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ondřej Ballek1] Laboratory of Immunobiology, Institute of Molecular Genetics AS CR, Prague, Czech Republic [2] Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan Valečka1] Laboratory of Immunobiology, Institute of Molecular Genetics AS CR, Prague, Czech Republic [2] Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jasper ManningLaboratory of Immunobiology, Institute of Molecular Genetics AS CR, Prague, Czech Republic.
Dominik FilippLaboratory of Immunobiology, Institute of Molecular Genetics AS CR, Prague, Czech Republic.
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Molecular Genetics · CZCharles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The initiation of T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling, based on the cobinding of TCR and CD4-Lck heterodimer to a peptide-major histocompatibility complex II on antigen presenting cells, represents a classical model of T-cell signaling. What is less clear however, is the mechanism which translates TCR engagement to the phosphorylation of immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs on CD3 chains and how this event is coupled to the delivery of Lck function. Recently proposed 'standby model of Lck' posits that resting T-cells contain an abundant pool of constitutively active Lck (pY394(Lck)) required for TCR triggering, and this amount, upon TCR engagement, remains constant. Here, we show that although maintenance of the limited pool of pY394(Lck) is necessary for the generation of TCR proximal signals in a time-restricted fashion, the total amount of this pool, ~2%, is much smaller than previously reported (~40%). We provide evidence that this dramatic discrepancy in the content of pY394(Lck)is likely the consequence of spontaneous phosphorylation of Lck that occurred after cell solubilization. Additional discrepancies can be accounted for by the sensitivity of different pY394(Lck)-specific antibodies and the type of detergents used. These data suggest that reagents and conditions used for the quantification of signaling parameters must be carefully validated and interpreted. Thus, the limited size of pY394(Lck) pool in primary T-cells invites a discussion regarding the adjustment of the quantitative parameters of the standby model of Lck and reevaluation of the mechanism by which this pool contributes to the generation of proximal TCR signaling.

Indexed as

ArtifactsAnimalsBenzoquinonesCell FractionationHumansJurkat CellsLactams, MacrocyclicLeukocyte Common AntigensLymphocyte ActivationLymphocyte Specific Protein Tyrosine Kinase p56(lck)MiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutPhosphorylationReceptors, Antigen, T-CellSignal TransductionBenzoquinonesgeldanamycinLactams, MacrocyclicLeukocyte Common AntigensLymphocyte Specific Protein Tyrosine Kinase p56(lck)Ptprc protein, mouseReceptors, Antigen, T-CellZAP-70 Protein-Tyrosine Kinase

Identifiers

PMID25420722
OpenAlexW1991509231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.