Observational studyAIDS research and human retroviruses2015
Antiretroviral-Experienced HIV-1-Infected Patients Treated with Maraviroc: Factors Associated with Virological Response.
Observational study in AIDS research and human retroviruses, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are few data on the clinical and virological factors associated with the virological response (VR) of maraviroc (MVC) in clinical practice. This study aimed to identify factors associated with the VR to MVC-containing regimens in 104 treatment-experienced but CCR5 inhibitor-naive HIV-1 patients. VR was defined at month 3 (M3) as HIV-1 RNA viral load (VL) <50 copies/ml. The impact on VR of age, sex, baseline tropism, HIV subtype (B vs. non-B), nadir CD4 cell count and CD4 cell count, baseline VL, genotypic susceptibility score of treatment, once or twice daily treatment, presence of raltegravir in optimized background therapy, and MVC concentrations was investigated. Median baseline VL was 3.3 log10 copies/ml (range 1.7-6.0 log10 copies/ml) and CD4 cell count was 299 cells/mm(3) (range 7-841 cells/mm(3)). At M3, 53.8% of patients were responders. In univariate analysis, a better efficacy of the MVC-containing regimen was associated with a high CD4 cell count (p=0.0069) and there was a trend for low baseline VL, high nadir CD4 cell count, and HIV subtype (B versus non-B). Only low baseline VL remained significantly associated with better VR in the multivariate analysis. This study demonstrated a VR of an optimized antiretroviral treatment including MVC in clinical practice similar to that observed in clinical trials. The factors associated with VR were higher baseline CD4 cell count in univariate analysis and lower baseline VL in multivariate analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.