Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25420455›Full record

Trial reportMaternal & child nutrition2015

In-home fortification with 2.5 mg iron as NaFeEDTA does not reduce anaemia but increases weight gain: a randomised controlled trial in Kenyan infants.

Tanja Barth-Jaeggi, Diego Moretti, Jane Kvalsvig, Penny A Holding, Jane Njenga, Alice Mwangi, Meera K Chhagan, Christophe Lacroix, Michael B Zimmermann

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Maternal & child nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Tanja Barth-JaeggiInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Diego MorettiInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jane KvalsvigUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Penny A HoldingInternational Centre for Behavioural Studies, Mombasa, Kenya.
Jane NjengaDepartment of Food, Technology and Nutrition, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Alice MwangiDepartment of Food, Technology and Nutrition, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Meera K ChhaganDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Christophe LacroixInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michael B ZimmermannInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
ETH Zurich · CHUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAUniversity of Nairobi · KEInternational Centre for Reproductive Health Kenya · KE

Funding

The effect of iron fortification of complementary foods on infant gut microbiotaU01HD064921 · NICHD · SWISS FEDERAL INST OF TECH (ETH ZURICH) · PI ZIMMERMANN, MICHAEL BRUCE · 2009 to 2011
$1.1M
NICHD NIH HHS U01HD06492NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD064921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In-home fortification of infants with micronutrient powders (MNPs) containing 12.5 mg iron may increase morbidity from infections; therefore, an efficacious low-dose iron-containing MNP might be advantageous. Effects of iron-containing MNPs on infant growth are unclear. We assessed the efficacy of a low-iron MNP on iron status and growth and monitored safety in a randomised, controlled, double-blind 1-year trial in 6-month-old infants (n = 287) consuming daily a maize porridge fortified with either a MNP including 2.5 mg iron as NaFeEDTA (MNP + Fe) or the same MNP without iron (MNP - Fe). At baseline, after 6 and 12 months, we determined haemoglobin (Hb), iron status [serum ferritin (SF), soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) and zinc protoporphyrin (ZPP)], inflammation [C-reactive protein (CRP)] and anthropometrics. We investigated safety using weekly morbidity questionnaires asking for diarrhoea, cough, flu, bloody or mucus-containing stool and dyspnoea, and recorded any other illness. Furthermore, feeding history and compliance were assessed weekly. At baseline, 71% of the infants were anaemic and 22% iron deficient; prevalence of inflammation was high (31% had an elevated CRP). Over the 1 year, Hb increased and SF decreased in both groups, without significant treatment effects of the iron fortification. At end point, the weight of infants consuming MNP + Fe was greater than in the MNP - Fe group (9.9 vs. 9.5 kg, P = 0.038). Mothers of infants in the MNP + Fe group reported more infant days spent with cough (P = 0.003) and dyspnoea (P = 0.0002); there were no significant differences on any other of the weekly morbidity measures. In this study, low-dose iron-containing MNP did not improve infant's iron status or reduce anaemia prevalence, likely because absorption was inadequate due to the high prevalence of infections and the low-iron dose.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsFood, FortifiedAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyC-Reactive ProteinDouble-Blind MethodEdetic AcidFemaleFerric CompoundsFerritinsHemoglobinsHumansInfantIronKenyaMaleMicronutrientsC-Reactive ProteinEdetic AcidFe(III)-EDTAFerric CompoundsFerritinsHemoglobinsIronMicronutrientsanaemiagrowthinfantiron fortificationmicronutrient powdersub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID25420455
PMCPMC6860217
OpenAlexW1695887275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.