Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25420096›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2014

Over-the-counter (OTC) medications for acute cough in children and adults in community settings.

Susan M Smith, Knut Schroeder, Tom Fahey

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04073251 (Randomized, Controlled, Double Blind Clinical Study on the Assessment of Efficacy, Safety and Palatability of "KalobaTuss® Children", a Syrup for the Treatment of Cough in Pediatric Age), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
30.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04073251 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Randomized, Controlled, Double Blind Clinical Study on the Assessment of Efficacy, Safety and Palatability of "KalobaTuss® Children", a Syrup for the Treatment of Cough in Pediatric Age (3-6 Years).

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "G. Martino"Ran2019 to 2019Enrolled106ConditionsCoughArmsKalobaTuss children, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 536 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Honey for acute cough in children - a systematic review.European journal of pediatrics · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Oral antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations for the common cold.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Treatments for subacute cough in primary care: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Honey for acute cough in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Codeine versus placebo for chronic cough in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  11. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the common cold.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Efficacy and safety of AtusinBMC pulmonary medicine · 2025
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Susan M SmithHRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, RCSI Medical School, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Knut Schroeder
Tom Fahey
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute cough due to upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) is a common symptom. Non-prescription, over-the-counter (OTC) medicines are frequently recommended as a first-line treatment, but there is little evidence as to whether these drugs are effective.

objectivesTo assess the effects of oral OTC cough preparations for acute cough in children and adults in community settings. SEARCH

methodsWe searched CENTRAL (2014, Issue 1), MEDLINE (January 1966 to March week 3 2014), EMBASE (January 1974 to March 2014), CINAHL (January 2010 to March 2014), LILACS (January 2010 to March 2014), Web of Science (January 2010 to March 2014) and the UK Department of Health National Research Register (March 2010). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oral OTC cough preparations with placebo in children and adults suffering from acute cough in community settings. We considered all cough outcomes; secondary outcomes of interest were adverse effects. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened potentially relevant citations, extracted data and assessed study quality. We performed quantitative analysis where appropriate. MAIN

resultsDue to the small numbers of trials in each category, the limited quantitative data available and the marked differences between trials in terms of participants, interventions and outcome measurement, we felt that pooling of the results was inappropriate.We included 29 trials (19 in adults, 10 in children) involving 4835 people (3799 adults and 1036 children). All studies were placebo-controlled RCTs. However, assessment of the risk of bias of the included studies was limited by poor reporting, particularly for the earlier studies.In the adult studies, six trials compared antitussives with placebo and had variable results. Three trials compared the expectorant guaifenesin with placebo; one indicated significant benefit, whereas the other two did not. One trial found that a mucolytic reduced cough frequency and symptom scores. Two studies examined antihistamine-decongestant combinations and found conflicting results. Four studies compared other combinations of drugs with placebo and indicated some benefit in reducing cough symptoms. Three trials found that antihistamines were no more effective than placebo in relieving cough symptoms.In the child studies, antitussives (data from three studies), antihistamines (data from three studies), antihistamine-decongestants (two studies) and antitussive/bronchodilator combinations (one study) were no more effective than placebo. No studies using expectorants met our inclusion criteria. The results of one trial favoured active treatment with mucolytics over placebo. One trial tested two paediatric cough syrups and both preparations showed a 'satisfactory response' in 46% and 56% of children compared to 21% of children in the placebo group. One new trial indicated that three types of honey were more effective than placebo over a three-day period.Twenty-one studies reported adverse effects. There was a wide range across studies, with higher numbers of adverse effects in participants taking preparations containing antihistamines and dextromethorphan. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe results of this review have to be interpreted with caution because the number of studies in each category of cough preparations was small. Availability, dosing and duration of use of over-the-counter cough medicines vary significantly in different countries. Many studies were poorly reported making assessment of risk of bias difficult and studies were also very different from each other, making evaluation of overall efficacy difficult. There is no good evidence for or against the effectiveness of OTC medicines in acute cough. This should be taken into account when considering prescribing antihistamines and centrally active antitussive agents in children; drugs that are known to have the potential to cause serious harm.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdministration, OralAdultAmbulatory CareAntitussive AgentsChildCoughDrug Therapy, CombinationExpectorantsHistamine H1 AntagonistsHumansNonprescription DrugsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntitussive AgentsExpectorantsHistamine H1 AntagonistsNonprescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID25420096
PMCPMC7061814
OpenAlexW1935276935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.