Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25420091›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Genome-wide identification and expression profile analysis of citrus sucrose synthase genes: investigation of possible roles in the regulation of sugar accumulation.

Mohammad Zahidul Islam, Xiao-Mei Hu, Long-Fei Jin, Yong-Zhong Liu, Shu-Ang Peng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comprehensive analysis of genomic loci associated with glaucousness in wheat (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The sucrose synthase gene family in blueberry (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Integrative analysis of grapevine (Frontiers in nutrition · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Citrus Taste Modification Potentials by Genetic Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammad Zahidul IslamKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Huazhong Agricultural University), Ministry of Education, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Mei HuKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Huazhong Agricultural University), Ministry of Education, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Long-Fei JinKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Huazhong Agricultural University), Ministry of Education, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Yong-Zhong LiuKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Huazhong Agricultural University), Ministry of Education, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Shu-Ang PengKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Huazhong Agricultural University), Ministry of Education, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Huazhong Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sucrose synthase (Sus) (EC 2.4.1.13) is a key enzyme for the sugar accumulation that is critical to form fruit quality. In this study, extensive data-mining and PCR amplification confirmed that there are at least six Sus genes (CitSus1-6) in the citrus genome. Gene structure and phylogeny analysis showed an evolutionary consistency with other plant species. The six Sus genes contain 12-15 exons and 11-14 introns and were evenly distributed into the three plant Sus groups (CitSus1 and CitSus2 in the Sus I group, CitSus3 and CitSus6 in the Sus II group, and CitSus4 and CitSus5 in the Sus III group). Transcripts of these six CitSus genes were subsequently examined. For tissues and organs, CitSus1 and 2 were predominantly expressed in fruit juice sacs (JS) whereas CitSus3 and 4 were predominantly expressed in early leaves (immature leaves), and CitSus5 and 6 were predominantly expressed in fruit JS and in mature leaves. During fruit development, CitSus5 transcript increased significantly and CitSus6 transcript decreased significantly in fruit JS. In the fruit segment membrane (SM), the transcript levels of CitSus2 and 5 were markedly higher and the abundant levels of CitSus3 and 6 gradually decreased. Moreover, transcript levels of CitSus1-4 examined were higher and the CitSus5 transcript level was lower in the fruit SM than in fruit JS, while CitSus6 had a similar transcript level in fruit JS and SM. In addition, transcripts of CitSus1-6 responded differently to dehydration in mature leaves or to mild drought stress in fruit JS and SM. Finally, the possible roles of Sus genes in the regulation of sugar accumulation are discussed; however, further study is required.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeCarbohydrate MetabolismCitrusDroughtsExonsGene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenome, PlantGlucosyltransferasesIntronsIsoenzymesPhylogenyPlant ProteinsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSucroseWaterGlucosyltransferasesIsoenzymesPlant ProteinsSucrosesucrose synthaseWater

Identifiers

PMID25420091
PMCPMC4242728
OpenAlexW2078239936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.