Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25419966›Full record

ArticlePsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2015

A prospective study of adolescents' nonmedical use of anxiolytic and sleep medication.

Carol J Boyd, Elizabeth Austic, Quyen Epstein-Ngo, Philip T Veliz, Sean Esteban McCabe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Initial validation of the expectancies for Benzodiazepine Analgesia Scale.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Carol J BoydSchool of Nursing, Addiction Research Center, University of Michigan.
Elizabeth AusticAddiction Research Center, University of Michigan.
Quyen Epstein-NgoSchool of Nursing, Addiction Research Center, and Institute for Research on Women and Gender, University of Michigan.
Philip T VelizAddiction Research Center, University of Michigan.
Sean Esteban McCabeAddiction Research Center, University of Michigan.
University of Michigan · USAddiction Research Foundation · USInstitute for Women's Policy Research · USNational Drug Addiction Center · BG

Funding

Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MCHR)UL1TR000433 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2012 to 2016
$49.9M
SUBSTANCE ABUSE INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING PROGRAMT32DA007267 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GNEGY, MARGARET E · 1994 to 2015
$4.5M
Trajectories of Prescription Nonmedical Drug MisuseR01DA031160 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SEAN ESTEBAN MCCABE · 2011 to 2026
$3.7M
A Prospective Study of the Nonmedical use of Prescription Medications by AdolesceR01DA024678 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BOYD, CAROL J · 2009 to 2013
$3.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000433NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000433NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024678NIDA NIH HHS R01DA024678NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031160NIDA NIH HHS R01DA031160NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this longitudinal study (N = 2,745) was to determine whether adolescents' recent medical use of anxiolytic or sleep medication was associated with increased incidence of using someone else's prescription for these classes of medication (nonmedical use). Data were collected from adolescents attending 5 Detroit area secondary schools between December and April in 3 consecutive academic years between 2009 and 2012. Respondents were assigned to the following 3 mutually exclusive groups for the analyses: (1) never prescribed anxiolytic or sleep medication (in their lifetime); (2) prescribed anxiolytic or sleep medication in their lifetime, but not during the study period; or (3) prescribed anxiolytic or sleep medication during the study period. Almost 9% of the sample had received a prescription for anxiolytic or sleep medication during their lifetime, and 3.4% had received at least 1 prescription during the 3-year study period. Compared with adolescents never prescribed anxiolytic or sleep medication, adolescents prescribed these medicines during the study period were 10 times more likely to engage in nonmedical use for reasons such as "to get high" or "to experiment" (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj.] = 10.15; 95% CI [3.97-25.91]), and 3 times more likely to engage in nonmedical use to self-treat anxiety or to sleep (ORadj. = 3.24; 95% CI [1.67-6.29]). Adolescents prescribed anxiolytics during their lifetime but not during the 3-year study were 12 times more likely to use another's anxiolytic medication, compared with adolescents never prescribed anxiolytics (ORadj. = 12.17; 95% CI [3.98-37.18]). These risk factors have significant implications for later substance use problems.

Indexed as

Anti-Anxiety AgentsHypnotics and SedativesPrescription DrugsAdolescentAffectCross-Sectional StudiesDrug UtilizationFemaleHealth SurveysHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMotivationProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSelf MedicationAnti-Anxiety AgentsHypnotics and SedativesPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID25419966
PMCPMC4388758
OpenAlexW2096405390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.