Trial reportThe Journal of cardiovascular nursing
Evidence-Based Heart Failure Medications and Cognition.
Trial report in The Journal of cardiovascular nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of a home-based activation intervention on self-management adherence and readmission in rural heart failure patients: the PATCH randomized controlled trial.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2016Trial
- Cognitive Safety and Outcomes of Pharmacological Management in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Differences in Pharmacological Treatment of Heart Failure Among Persons with or without Major Cognitive Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on National Registries in Sweden.Drugs & aging · 2024Article
- Cognitive impairment in patients with heart failure: molecular mechanism and therapy.Heart failure reviews · 2023Review
- Cognitive Dysfunction in Heart Failure: Pathophysiology and Implications for Patient Management.Current heart failure reports · 2022Review
- Observational
- Drug interactions with dementia-related pathophysiological pathways worsen or prevent dementia.British journal of pharmacology · 2019Review
- Heart Failure and Cognitive Impairment: Clinical Relevance and Therapeutic Considerations.Current cardiology reviews · 2019Review
- Management of Cognitive Impairment in Heart Failure.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe etiology of cognitive impairment in heart failure (HF) is controversial and likely multifactorial. Physicians may hesitate to prescribe evidence-based HF medication because of concerns related to potential negative changes in cognition among a population that is already frequently impaired. We conducted a study to determine if prescription of evidence-based HF medications (specifically, β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blocking agents, diuretics, and aldosterone inhibitors) was associated with cognition in a large HF sample.
methodsA total of 612 patients completed baseline data collection for the Rural Education to Improve Outcomes in Heart Failure clinical trial, including information about medications. Global cognition was evaluated using the Mini-Cog.
resultsThe sample mean (SD) age was 66 (13) years, 58% were men, and 89% were white. Global cognitive impairment was identified in 206 (34%) of the 612 patients. Prescription of evidence-based HF medications was not related to global cognitive impairment in this sample. This relationship was maintained even after adjusting for potential confounders (eg, age, education, and comorbid burden).
conclusionPrescription of evidence-based HF medications is not related to low scores on a measure of global cognitive function in rural patients with HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.