Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25419713›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Genomic and biological characterization of a new cypovirus isolated from Dendrolimus punctatus.

Yin Zhou, Tongcheng Qin, Yuzhou Xiao, Fujun Qin, Chengfeng Lei, Xiulian Sun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Transcriptional Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A ~40-kb flavi-like virus does not encode a known error-correcting mechanism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yin ZhouKey Laboratory of Agricultural and Environmental Microbiology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Tongcheng QinKey Laboratory of Agricultural and Environmental Microbiology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yuzhou XiaoKey Laboratory of Agricultural and Environmental Microbiology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Fujun QinKey Laboratory of Agricultural and Environmental Microbiology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Chengfeng LeiKey Laboratory of Agricultural and Environmental Microbiology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiulian SunKey Laboratory of Agricultural and Environmental Microbiology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNWuhan Institute of Virology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel cypovirus (designated DpCPV-MC) was isolated from the pine moth Dendrolimus punctatus using serial in vivo cloning procedures. DpCPV-MC occurs in typical polyhedral occlusion bodies, containing a number of spherical virions. Laboratory bioassays indicated that the infectivity of DpCPV-MC against second-instar Spodoptera exigua larvae does not differ significantly from that of Dendrolimus punctatus cypovirus 1. Full-length amplification of the DpCPV-MC cDNAs identified 16 dsRNA genome segments. Each segment encodes one open reading frame with unique conserved terminal sequences at the 5' and 3' ends, which differ from those of all previously reported cypoviruses. On a phylogenetic tree based on the amino acid sequences of the polyhedrin of 19 cypovirus species, DpCPV-MC was closest to the type-4 cypoviruses. Homology searches showed that ten segments of DpCPV-MC (S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S7, S8, S9, S12, and S13) encode putative CPV structural and nonstructural proteins, three segments (S6, S10 and S14) encode putative insect proteins or other viral proteins, and the other three segments (S11, S15, and S16) encode proteins that have no obvious sequence similarity to any known protein. Based on RNA secondary structures analysis, two segments of them (S11 and S16) were predicted to possibly transcript less efficiently than the other segments. We speculate that DpCPV-MC is composed of several genotypes. The ten CPV-related segments constantly exist in all genotypes, and one or two of the six CPV-unrelated segments co-exist with the ten CPV-related segments in one DpCPV-MC genotype, thus each virion contains no more than 12 segments. Based on our results and the literature, DpCPV-MC is a new cypovirus (Cypovirus 22, strain DpCPV-22).

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceBlotting, NorthernGenome, ViralGenomicsGenotypeHost-Pathogen InteractionsLarvaMicroscopy, ElectronMolecular Sequence DataMothsNucleic Acid ConformationPhylogenyReoviridaeRNA, Double-StrandedRNA, ViralRNA, Double-StrandedRNA, ViralViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25419713
PMCPMC4242531
OpenAlexW1992616770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.