ArticlePloS one2014
Exploring the distribution of genetic markers of pharmacogenomics relevance in Brazilian and Mexican populations.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic structure of pharmacogenetic biomarkers in Brazil inferred from a systematic review and population-based cohorts: a RIBEF/EPIGEN-Brazil initiative.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2018Pooled it
- The SLCO1A2 -189_-188InsA polymorphism reduces clearance of rocuronium in patients submitted to elective surgeries.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Trial
- Trial
- Genotyping of DPYD and UGT1A1 in Brazilian oncological patients: applying pharmacogenomics in an admixed population.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
- Integrating CRISPR functional genomics with admixture-aware psychotropic pharmacogenetics in Brazil.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Analysis of genomic ancestry and characterization of a new variant in MPS type VII.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Systematic analysis of the pharmacogenomics landscape towards clinical implementation of precision therapeutics in Greece.Human genomics · 2025Article
- Genetic diversity of variants involved in drug response among Tunisian and Italian populations toward personalized medicine.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Allele and genotype frequencies of variants in P450 cytochromes, transports, and DNA repair enzymes in the Dominican Republic population.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Pharmacogenomic profiling of the South Korean population: Insights and implications for personalized medicine.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Prevalence of single-nucleotide variants in twenty-five pharmacogenes from a Cuban sample cohort.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Distribution of a novelFrontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Pharmacogenomic implications of the differential distribution of CYP2C9 metabolic phenotypes among Latin American populations.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Pharmacogenomics and health disparities, are we helping?Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- Pharmacogenomics: the low-hanging fruit in the personalized medicine tree.Human genetics · 2022Article
- Population impact of pharmacogenetic tests in admixed populations across the Americas.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2021Article
- Identification of ancestry proportions in admixed groups across the Americas using clinical pharmacogenomic SNP panels.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Population structure and pharmacogenomic risk stratification in the United States.BMC biology · 2020Article
- Influence ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies of pharmacogenomics-related traits are increasingly being performed to identify loci that affect either drug response or susceptibility to adverse drug reactions. However, the effect of the polymorphisms can differ in magnitude or be absent depending on the population being assessed. We used the Affymetrix Drug Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters (DMET) Plus array to characterize the distribution of polymorphisms of pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics (PGx) relevance in two samples from the most populous Latin American countries, Brazil and Mexico. The sample from Brazil included 268 individuals from the southeastern state of Rio de Janeiro, and was stratified into census categories. The sample from Mexico comprised 45 Native American Zapotecas and 224 self-identified Mestizo individuals from 5 states located in geographically distant regions in Mexico. We evaluated the admixture proportions in the Brazilian and Mexican samples using a panel of Ancestry Informative Markers extracted from the DMET array, which was validated with genome-wide data. A substantial variation in ancestral proportions across census categories in Brazil, and geographic regions in Mexico was identified. We evaluated the extent of genetic differentiation (measured as FST values) of the genetic markers of the DMET Plus array between the relevant parental populations. Although the average levels of genetic differentiation are low, there is a long tail of markers showing large frequency differences, including markers located in genes belonging to the Cytochrome P450, Solute Carrier (SLC) and UDP-glucuronyltransferase (UGT) families as well as other genes of PGx relevance such as ABCC8, ADH1A, CHST3, PON1, PPARD, PPARG, and VKORC1. We show how differences in admixture history may have an important impact in the distribution of allele and genotype frequencies at the population level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.