Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25419544›Full record

ArticleQualitative report (Online)2013

Male Spouses of Women Physicians: Communication, Compromise, and Carving Out Time.

Carol Isaac, Kara Petrashek, Megan Steiner, Linda Baier Manwell, Angela Byars-Winston, Molly Carnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative report (Online), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carol Isaac
Kara Petrashek
Megan Steiner
Linda Baier Manwell
Angela Byars-Winston
Molly Carnes

Funding

WOMEN'S HEALTH AND AGING: RESEARCH &LEADERSHIP TRAININGT32AG000265 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CARNES, MOLLY L. · 1999 to 2008
$2.2M
Advancement of Women in STEMM: A Multi-level Research and Action ProjectR01GM088477 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CARNES, MOLLY L. · 2009 to 2012
$1.2M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000265NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the numbers of female physicians continue to grow, fewer medical marriages are comprised of the traditional dyad of male physician and stay-at-home wife. The "two-career family" is an increasingly frequent state for both male and female physicians' families, and dual-doctor marriages are on the rise. This qualitative study explored the contemporary medical marriage from the perspective of male spouses of female physicians. In 2010, we conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews with nine spouses of internal medicine resident and faculty physicians. Interviewers queried work-home balance, career choices, and support networks. We used an interpretive, inductive, iterative approach to thematically analyze interview transcripts and develop broad, consensus-derived themes. A conceptual framework based on three major themes emerged: "A time for us? Really?", "Supporting and protecting her, sometimes at my expense,'" and "Hers is a career, mine is a job." This framework described the inflexibility of physicians' time and its impact on spousal time, career development, and choices. Having a set time for synchronizing schedules, frequent verbal support, and shared decision-making were seen as important by the husbands of female, full-time physicians. This exploratory study examined the contemporary medical marriage from the male spouse's perspective and highlights specific strategies for success.

Indexed as

Academic MedicineCareerGenderMedical MarriageQualitative ResearchWork-Life Balance

Identifiers

PMID25419544
PMCPMC4238294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.