Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25419533›Full record

ArticleAJOB empirical bioethics2014

Motivations of Patients with Diabetes to Participate in Research.

Cynthia Geppert, Philip Candilis, Stephen Baker, Charles Lidz, Paul Appelbaum, Kenneth Fletcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOB empirical bioethics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Patient participation in the development and application of eHealth].TSG : tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen · 2021
    Article
  6. Impact of pharmaceutical care on mental well-being and perceived health among community-dwelling individuals with type 2 diabetes.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cynthia GeppertNew Mexico Veterans Affairs Health Care System - Ethics 1501 San Pedro Dr. SE University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico 87108.
Philip CandilisUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School.
Stephen BakerUniversity of Massachusetts.
Charles LidzUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School.
Paul AppelbaumColumbia University.
Kenneth FletcherUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School.

Funding

COMPETENCE OF HUMAN SUBJECTS TO CONSENT TO RESEARCHK01MH001851 · NIMH · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI CANDILIS, PHILIP J · 1999 to 2003
$457k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH001851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch on the motivations of research participants has focused primarily on vulnerable populations at risk of exploitation, and there is little research on the motivations and reasons of general medical patients participating in research. Given a significant increase in research studies recruiting participants with diabetes, we sought to better understand the motivations of patients with diabetes considering a general medical research protocol.

methodsThe analyses presented here compare the reasoning and willingness to participate in a hypothetical research study of medically ill subjects (patients with diabetes, n=51) with non-ill (n=57) subjects. Responses on the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR) were correlated with demographic variables and scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Short-Form-36 (SF-36).

resultsOverall, 44% of the group with diabetes and 56% of the comparison group indicated a willingness to participate in the research study. The reasons diabetic and comparison groups offered for willingness or unwillingness to participate in research did not differ significantly. 75% mentioned reasons related to treatment, 63% altruism; none mentioned money. Of those patients with diabetes who would not participate in research, 94% cited risk, and 89% expressed an aversion to research.

conclusionsThe present study suggests that when research is not related to their diagnosis, persons with diabetes do not differ significantly from non-ill comparison subjects in their motivations to participate in research. Given the similarity of our subjects' motivations to those of other medically ill populations, it may be that investigators can now focus more closely on the decision-making characteristics of their patients involved in clinical research rather than their diagnoses.

Indexed as

BioethicsDiabetesEmpirical ethicsGeneral medical researchResearch participationResearch subject motivations

Identifiers

PMID25419533
PMCPMC4236852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.