ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2014
Prognostic significance of high-risk human papillomavirus and p16(INK4A) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- HPV prevalence in esophageal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Immunohistochemical prognostic markers of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review.Chinese journal of cancer · 2017Pooled it
- The association between human papillomavirus 16 and esophageal cancer in Chinese population: a meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2015Pooled it
- Causal Link of Human Papillomavirus in Barrett Esophagus and Adenocarcinoma: Are We There Yet?Cancers · 2023Review
- Prognostic value of p16, p53, and pcna in sarcoma and an evaluation of immune infiltration.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Article
- Viral Pathogens in Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- p16 in highly malignant esophageal carcinomas: the correlation with clinicopathological factors and human papillomavirus infection.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2021Article
- Loss of p16 and high Ki67 labeling index is associated with poor outcome in esophageal carcinoma.Oncotarget · 2020Article
- Survival Rates for Patients With Barrett High-grade Dysplasia and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma With or Without Human Papillomavirus Infection.JAMA network open · 2018Article
- Detection of HPV16 in Esophageal Cancer in a High-Incidence Region of Malawi.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- HPV infection and p53 and p16 expression in esophageal cancer: are they prognostic factors?Infectious agents and cancer · 2017Article
- p53 expression but not p16(INK4A) correlates with human papillomavirus-associated esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Kazakh population.Infectious agents and cancer · 2016Article
- Oncological and surgical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a matched-pair comparative study.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Article
- Case-matched analysis of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic versus open esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognostic value of the HPV status in ESCC is much controversial, this study aimed to determine the prognostic importance of high-risk HPV and p16 in patients with ESCC. A total of 105 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy in 2008 were included in this study. All specimens with ESCC were tested by in situ hybridization for HPV16/18 and immunohistochemistry for p16 expression. Kappa values were calculated using Cohen's kappa test. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated in relation to the two markers and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the hazard ratio (HR) of variables. Thirty-nine (37.1%) of 105 were p16-positive, and HPV was detected in 29 of the 105 patients (27.6%) with ESCC. P16 was detected in 25 of the 29 patients (86.2%) who were HPV-positive, and only 14 of 76 patients (18.4%) who were HPV-negative (P < 0.001). Cohen's kappa coefficient revealed an agreement in two researchers (kappa = 0.61). The 5-year OS rate and PFS rate in the p16-positive group were 64.1% and 58.7%, respectively, and the rates in the p16-negative group were 45.5%, 37.9%, respectively. The difference of survival rate between the two groups remained statistically significant. P16-positive patients had better 5-year rates of OS and PFS than p16-negative group (P = 0.02 and P = 0.007 by the Log-rank test, respectively). Using HPV status as a stratification factor, we found differences in OS and PFS that were consistent with those based on p16 expression. P16 is a very good marker of HPV infection for ESCC. HPV-positive or p16-positive ESCC is a distinct entity with a favorable prognosis compared with HPV-negative or p16-negative ESCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25419379PMC4238498What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.